Here's where I'm at with all of this:
Unless you believe that vast amounts of corroborated and widely accepted recorded history from the Roman empire are a lie/fake
(I suppose anything is possible), it's pretty universally agreed upon that someone named Jesus of Nazareth who claimed to be the Messiah/Son of God walked the Earth 2000'ish years ago, convinced a lot of people that his claims were legitimate, got a lot of people to buy into them, and was executed by Pontius Pilate.
It's not just, "well it's in the Bible, so it's true". There are numerous second and third hand written records (from Romans as well as Jews, even some from further away empires/lands) that acknowledge the life/existence/death by crucifixion of Christ.
en.wikipedia.org
Where the debate sets in, is regarding if Jesus is who he said he was and, in particular, how much embellishment was baked into the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John). It's also a matter of... how much 'telephone' was played with Jesus' messages/guidance?
I don't, and likely never will, have any answer to how reliable the gospels are and what parts are true and which parts are myth/lies/embellishment.
Some stuff, like the Sermon on the Mount, seems pretty likely/plausible. Other stuff, like walking on water, curing leprosy via laying of hands, or manipulating bread/turning water into wine seems.... less likely.
To be honest, I'm no longer really that interested in trying to get in the weeds on that stuff. If, someday we get the ability to view recorded memories (like 'the Animus' in Assassins Creed

) I'd definitely take a whirl back in time and be willing to see what actually happened and what was real/what was embellished. If it turns out Jesus was a complete fraud or a delusional madman that tricked a bunch of other delusional weirdos, I'll admit I was wrong.
Until then though, I'm inclined to believe that Jesus both existed and he was who he said he was.
It's not just 'hedging my bets'... it revolves more about the fact that the core things he asked us to do in exchange for salvation are all pretty standard things that non-scumbag people should already be doing. It wasn't, "build monuments in my name and give money to my descendants", it was just, "be kind to one another, try your best to live like I did (even though it's not possible to hit 100% on that and you should forgive yourself when you try your best but still fail), and if your kindness/being a good person causes others to ask why you're being so kind/good, tell them it's because it's what my Father wanted and that's your ticket to heaven".
I dunno, seems pretty reasonable to me and while I don't buy into EVERYTHING and get neurotic about following Biblical rules to the letter, I do buy into the central message and deep down I feel that's the way we as human being were intended to live our lives.
I also feel comfort in knowing that if I do my best to live a meaningful life and follow the basic teaching of Christ and spread the word
(and again, this isn't some 'new OSU' thing that I'll be incorporating into everything going forward... I'm still me, I don't need to advertise my faith, if it comes up I'll mention it but it will likely rarely come up) that I'll have place secured for me in heaven after I die, which will eventually happen.
That's just my .02 on it, I'm not trying to impose my will or beliefs on everyone. I don't want to get into some huge argument where I tell people they are wrong because they disagree with me. Feel free to disagree and I get it. It took me quite a long time and a lot of doubt to finally get here.
It came up though, so I'm just being honest in the way I've chosen to approach things.