Originally posted by: ChrisminaL
Date: March 07, 2016 at 10:53 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/are-there-any-more-trains-leaving-the-station.68634/
smartigan said:
It's all about celebrating fighters losing these days sadly
Click to expand...
True dat.
Werdum has the performance of his life against Velasquez -> Velasquez was stupid not preparing in altitude
Conor destroys Mendes -> Mendes didn't have a full camp. He toys Aldo -> lucky punch
Michael Bisping shows heart and fight IQ -> Anderson was stupid playing around
Rockhold being Rockhold (one of the best mma fighter ever) -> Weidman threw a stupid spinning kick
Holm plays with Ronda -> Always said Ronda had a bad striking defense
Nate Diaz submits Conor -> LOL, Conor has no ground game
Miesha submits Holm -> LOL, Holm has no ground game
It's not even about celebrating fighters losing, it's about explaining why someone lost, instead of understanding why the other won.
Quick analysis:
(because I told my mate live what Nate needed to do to win):
Everytime Nate threw a jab, Conor slipped and countered and at the beginning Nate was afraid to go for his signature 1-2.
At some point Conor only slipped and didn't counter anymore. I told my friend "When you're an elite fighter, you don't have weaknesses, but you have habits, and that becomes weaknesses. Conor always defend the jab with the same move; if Nate follows it with the cross, it'll be a hit".
That was the story, after the slip, Conor made rebalanced his whole body between his legs, and he met the cross of Nate, got hurt and well, when you're hurt and Nate has the mount, you can be as slick as you want, there's a high chanc you're getting subbed (Gomi is another example).
That's my very quick analysis. Conor is known for collecting data during a fight, he only collected Nate's data, not his own. That was the beginning of the end.