Originally posted by: Contender Date: December 18, 2012 at 06:33 PM Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/dont-turn-off-signatures-ignore-the-user.50290/
I like signatures but I hate that some insecure anus-breaths think that putting an obnoxious gif or huge pic in their sig doesn't make them an ***.
So I just realised a solution. If someone is so callous that they are willing to annoy people every time they post, then I don't want to hear their opinions anyway. By ignoring any user with an irritating signature, you don't see their posts at all but you can still see everyone else's signatures that aren't completely irksome.
It also means that if enough people do this, the morons who use idiotic signatures will eventually realise that nobody is talking to them anymore and might just change them.
Originally posted by: mabrown45 Date: December 18, 2012 at 06:46 PM Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/dont-turn-off-signatures-ignore-the-user.50290/
Originally posted by: Contender Date: December 18, 2012 at 09:24 PM Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/dont-turn-off-signatures-ignore-the-user.50290/
Thir13en said:
No sigs is much better.
Click to expand...
Again, in general I like sigs. So no, turning them off isn't better (for me).
Given that board software can limit the size of signatures, including the size of graphics used and whether or not they're gifs, the best option would be to simply implement those features.
Originally posted by: Fight Magnet Date: December 18, 2012 at 09:51 PM Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/dont-turn-off-signatures-ignore-the-user.50290/
Meh, I have no problems with any of these issues. Sigs Av's whatever
You're supposed to call the dude out in the Sig bet thread.
http://www.mmajunkie.com/forum/threads/official-signatures-betting-thread.49753/
edit: actually that's where the stupid sigs probably come from.
