Originally posted by: vfrex
Date: November 26, 2010 at 04:30 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/dustin-poirier-will-face-josh-grispi-at-ufc-125.32681/
Jak said:
CopperHeart said:
What's the sense of pairing up a guy who was about to fight for the belt against someone who's 1-1 in the promotion?
Click to expand...
Grispi shows he's a fighter through and through. He had a title fight on a UFC card, and would've fight on main event fight but signed to fight whoever when that chance fell apart.
Whether it was trying to make his new company happy or whether he just didn't want to pull a Rashad and sit out for an undetermined period waiting and waiting for an opponent, you gotta have respect for him as a fighter.
If he loses, well, a loss is a loss regardless of if it's to the champ or a guy who's not the champ.
(however... this card really isn't swaying me to want to but it... yet)
Click to expand...
I mostly agree with you, but Rashad and Grispi are at two different points in their careers. Comparatively, Grispi has everything to gain while Rashad has more to lose.
Grispi gets to fight a guy he will most likely beat subbing in for a guy he probably wouldn't beat, on a UFC card. The fight (which will be a win) puts him 1 step closer to a UFC contract (more $), and given the likely mismatch, gives him a decent opportunity to finish and earn a bonus. He's topping out at around 20-30k of disclosed pay at WEC events, and being a relatively unknown fighter, I doubt that sponsorship money is rolling in. With the mismatch, he gets a decent chance to earn a $50k finish of the night bonus on top, and he could easily make more in one night than he's made in his entire time in the WEC. Further, he gains critical exposure to new fans AND sponsors.
We'll have to check back in a few years when Grispi is more established.