John Jones v.s. Rashad Evans @ UFC 122. Anyone interested?

Nastycrow

Mr. BlobTitz
Staff member
Originally posted by: hawk316
Date: August 02, 2010 at 01:09 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/john-jones-v-s-rashad-evans-ufc-122-anyone-interested.28653/

For so many reasons I think that should be Jones' next fight. He barely broke a sweat, Evans is a top LHW without an opponent. Shogun as Dana said won't be avaliable until spring or summer. Know way Rashad can sit that long. After all what is the UFC paying him to do? FIGHT! I know Rashad wasw promised a title shot but **** happens, Shogun is hurt. Rashad would still get Shogun if he beats Jones plus the people wouldlove to see Jones against a top contender. It's a win win for the fans and the UFC. If you look at the UFC's history if this was another fighter Dana would be making the fight like yesterday. Think about it how many headliners does the UFC have that's avaliable, they just announced a MIr/Nog, Little Nog/Bader headliner. Not to mention the Coture/Toney headliner, Please Dana remember this isn't boxing, give the people what they want, Great fights!
 
Originally posted by: darcebandit
Date: August 02, 2010 at 01:10 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/john-jones-v-s-rashad-evans-ufc-122-anyone-interested.28653/

JONES VS EVANS WILL NOT HAPPEN UNLESS ITS FOR A TITLE SHOT
 
Originally posted by: dante1011
Date: August 02, 2010 at 01:18 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/john-jones-v-s-rashad-evans-ufc-122-anyone-interested.28653/

darcebandit said:
JONES VS EVANS WILL NOT HAPPEN UNLESS ITS FOR A TITLE SHOT
Click to expand...
anyother time i'd b---- about the font but i think its needed here
 
Originally posted by: TheLethalLefty
Date: August 02, 2010 at 01:18 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/john-jones-v-s-rashad-evans-ufc-122-anyone-interested.28653/

BEACAUSE THEY ARE ON THE SAME TEAM, AND THEY WOULD PREFER NOT TO FIGHT ONE ANOTHER! JUST THOUGHT I'D CLARIFY
 
Originally posted by: HBK42581
Date: August 02, 2010 at 01:20 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/john-jones-v-s-rashad-evans-ufc-122-anyone-interested.28653/

No no no. It would have to be for THE TITLE. Not a title shot. THE TITLE!
 
Originally posted by: darcebandit
Date: August 02, 2010 at 01:22 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/john-jones-v-s-rashad-evans-ufc-122-anyone-interested.28653/

HBK42581 said:
No no no. It would have to be for THE TITLE. Not a title shot. THE TITLE!
Click to expand...
yeah just seen that sorry i messed up for
THE TITLE
 
Originally posted by: darcebandit
Date: August 02, 2010 at 01:25 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/john-jones-v-s-rashad-evans-ufc-122-anyone-interested.28653/

And its JON not JOHN
 
Back
Top