Originally posted by: GuidaClayAllDay
Date: October 28, 2009 at 01:58 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/jon-jones-vs-matt-hamill.18646/
Jon Jones
Junior College Wrestling Champion at Iowa Central, Greco-Roman All-American in High School, 84 inch reach
9-0 Notable fights: Dominant Decision wins over Andre Gusamo and Stephen Bonnar, Submission win over Jake O'Brien
Jon “Bones" Jones is arguably the most hyped athlete in the UFC today…and rightfully so with his amazing body frame, takedown skills, and his flashy offensive strikes. He still very green…making his pro debut only 18 months ago.
Matt Hamill
Three-time NCAA D-III National Champion at RIT, gold and silver medals in Deaflympics
7-2 Notable fights: TKO win over Reese Andy, Head Kick KO over Mark Munoz, loss to Rich Franklin and controversial loss to Michael Bisping
Hamill is already coming off 2 wins against strong wrestlers...2 time D-1 All American Mark Munoz and 3 time D-1 All American Reese Andy. In both matches Hamill sprawled effectively and nullified their takedown attempts.
After watching Jones’s fights in the UFC…my first reaction was that he improved his weaknesses tremendously.
Jones likes to throw a lot of different strikes. He is very unpredictable…not just the flying knees and spinning elbows…but he mixes up his kicks and punches to the head, body, and legs very well. Bones’s punching was not technically sound in his fight with Andre Gusmao..but it looked much better against Jake O'Brien. He threw a lot of straight punches and used his jab very well…really getting the maximum benefit of his reach by keeping O’Brien on the outside.
After Jones was done throwing Bonnar around like a rag doll in the first 2 rounds of that his 2nd UFC fight, it looked like Jones was too tired to do the same in the 3rd…and gave Bonner the 3rd round. Against O’Brein Bonnar seemed a lot lighter on his feet, threw an ample amount of strikes in the first and second and was still going strong until the Sub win. I believe Jones at this point has the better endurance…he definitely has much better footwork.
It’s nice that we’ve already seen how Jones can perform against a fighter with a wrestling base…BUT it’s important to note that O’Brien is wrestling is second-rate compared to other wrestlers in the UFC. O’Brein was 14-18 his sophmore year at Purdue; he redshirted his first year and didn’t compete after his sophmore year. Hamill and Dan Henderson are likely the top 2 wrestlers at 185 with no close 3rd place.
Jones’s striking and his nimbleness on his feet have improved greatly to the point where I think Jones can win the fight with his unpredictable strikes on the feet. Hamill likes to limit his strikes to just punches…besides the Head Kick to Munoz Hammil really doesn’t throw kicks and he’s likely to be too slow to catch Jones with one.
The question that’s one everyone’s mind is who will be the better wrestler? Credentials-wise I'd like to think Hamill. Hamill was able to takedown Bisping and Rich Franklin, but he didn’t attempt any takedowns against Andy or Munoz. I don’t know if this was because he felt he was the better striker against Munoz and Andy or that with their wrestling backgrounds it would have been difficult to take them down.
Hamill will likely be too tired to take down Jones in the 3rd round. Jones’s sprawl was very effective against O’Brien, and with Jones’s long legs it will be harder for Hamill to finish a shot and wrap his arms around them.
But I think if Jones decides to throw too many wild spinning punches/elbows or flying knees, I think Hamill will capitalize and put Jones on the ground if timed properly.
Even if Hamill does manage to take Jones down, I’m not that worried because
he has displayed a lackluster ground and pound game
, and hasn't displayed any submission skills. Hamill failed to lock in an arm triangle on Bisping, and seems to not have much skill at passing the guard. Weighing in Jones’s size and wrestling skills, plus Hamill’s lack of takedown attempts/lack of damage done after the takedown…I don't think Hamill's wrestling gives him much upside.
People claim that Hamill’s striking has improved since TUF 3. While this may be true, I think his striking still needs more improvement. He is still often telegraphing his punches and and throwing them off-balance.
Side Notes:
-Hamill lately likes to use his left hand to hold his opponent’s head down while uppercutting the opponent with his right. This strategy worked against shorter opponents, but should not be of much use against the 6’4’’ Jones.
-Hamill can take a ton of punishment. Franklin was picking him a part with everything he had, yet Hamill showed no sign of slowing down. I can definitely see him stalking Jones the entire fight with Jones continuously on the move (but Jones was very successful doing this against O’Brien).
-We really haven’t seen Jon Jones’s chin tested. Bonnar and Gusmao are not known for their power, while Hamill definitely has power in his hands. I like to think that Jones will not be getting punched on his feet too much in this fight.
Conclusion: I think Hamill’s wrestling ability is getting too much credit…because he really hasn’t used it to much of an advantage (besides keeping the fight standing) over his last few fights. Jones will be changing levels and throwing punches and kicks all over Hamill's body, while Hamill’s striking is very limited and probably will struggle to get within range to strike due to Jones’s reach and fast footwork.
I think there’s good value on Jones until –200, and the value starts trickling away until –240. I probably wouldn’t consider Hamill a good value play until +280 (Sorry SPX you’re my boy).
Let me know what you guys think.
EDIT: I took Jones for 2.5u at -185...I might want to hedge to 2u. I doubt Jones's line will get better than -185.