Misleading Headlines

Nastycrow

Mr. BlobTitz
Staff member
Originally posted by: osubuckeye4
Date: May 09, 2013 at 09:19 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/misleading-headlines.54462/

s--- like this pisses me off, and it's all over the mainstream media.
HEADLINE:
Blacks outvoted whites in 2012, the first time on record
Link:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.co...s-in-2012-the-first-time-on-record/?hpt=hp_t2
What they want you to think before reading:
That more black people in the U.S. voted than white people.
What the article is actually about:
For the first time ever, a higher PERCENTAGE of black people (66%) voted than white people (64.1%)
 
Originally posted by: NicoSuave
Date: May 09, 2013 at 12:18 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/misleading-headlines.54462/

Ummmmm..... What exactly is the problem here? Are you upset that a higher percentage of black people voted last year than white people, or are you upset that a website article wasn't as specific as you would've liked?
 
Originally posted by: osubuckeye4
Date: May 09, 2013 at 12:24 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/misleading-headlines.54462/

NicoSuave said:
Ummmmm..... What exactly is the problem here? Are you upset that a higher percentage of black people voted last year than white people, or are you upset that a website article wasn't as specific as you would've liked?
Click to expand...
I couldn't care less about voting trends.
I just hate it when news outlets post intentionally misleading headlines.
Like when a headline says, "Killer snowstorm taking lives!" and then you open up the article and read that some 87 year old lady passed away because her heating went out. It wasn't really the snowstorm that took her life... it was the fact that her heating went out and she was old.
Or the articles every year about shark attacks. The media will write something like, "Shark Attack Epidemic Spreading!" and then you will read the article and find that 3 people have died all year, which is actually on par with every other year that shark attack deaths have been reported.
In this case the outlet obviously knew that anyone who saw that headline would think, "wait, what? More black people than white people voted? That can't be right... only like 12% of the country is black", and click on the link.
 
Originally posted by: Bob002
Date: May 09, 2013 at 12:27 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/misleading-headlines.54462/

I hate when people talk about former fighters that were cut and brought back. They put "resigns" instead of "re-signs".
 
Originally posted by: gongabong
Date: May 09, 2013 at 02:43 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/misleading-headlines.54462/

osubuckeye4 said:
s--- like this pisses me off, and it's all over the mainstream media.
http://[/quote]You
Click to expand...
You
Must Hate FOX News then
 
Originally posted by: osubuckeye4
Date: May 09, 2013 at 02:51 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/misleading-headlines.54462/

gongabong said:
You
Must Hate FOX News then
Click to expand...
Si, correcto.
 
Originally posted by: LitMatch
Date: May 09, 2013 at 03:55 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/misleading-headlines.54462/

The county I live in is called Wood County. The local paper took some flack a couple years ago when they went with the headline:
Little Wood Girl Dies In Fire
 
Originally posted by: mmablaster
Date: May 09, 2013 at 04:09 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/misleading-headlines.54462/

I hate when it says something like, "Kongo Cut From UFC" when actually Kongo just fought the last fight on his deal. He wasn't cut, he just fulfilled his contract and the UFC doesn't want to offer him a new one. Getting cut means you fought 1-3 out of 4 fights on the 4 fight deal and the UFC terminated your contract.
 
Originally posted by: osubuckeye4
Date: May 09, 2013 at 04:33 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/misleading-headlines.54462/

mmablaster said:
I hate when it says something like, "Kongo Cut From UFC" when actually Kongo just fought the last fight on his deal. He wasn't cut, he just fulfilled his contract and the UFC doesn't want to offer him a new one. Getting cut means you fought 1-3 out of 4 fights on the 4 fight deal and the UFC terminated your contract.
Click to expand...
Exactly, things like this bug me.
Saying a fighter is cut attracts more eyeballs though because you want to look and see what the reason behind the cut was.
Junkie doesn't usually resort to s--- like this, but a lot of the other sites do.
 
Originally posted by: gongabong
Date: May 09, 2013 at 07:12 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/misleading-headlines.54462/

osubuckeye4 said:
Si, correcto.
Click to expand...
KINDRED
 
Originally posted by: Thir13en
Date: May 10, 2013 at 11:16 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/misleading-headlines.54462/

Lampford Man Missing!
What's he missing? A train? His pants? I mean c'mon!
 
Back
Top