Originally posted by: GoodCat
Date: May 27, 2010 at 11:22 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/to-buy-or-not-to-buy.26058/
JonnyF said:
I don't get the "EA MMA is gonna suck because they have to build from the ground up."
Did THQ not have to build 2009 from the ground up? It seems to get good reviews, and 2010 is built off of it and is getting mixed reviews.
My biggest complaint is the striking controls with Undisputed, and the Fight Night stlye EA is going to be using seems like a good solution. The whole face button striking just doesn't sit right with me for MMA, but the Fight Night style might not work well either. We just have to wait and find out.
Click to expand...
What don't you like about face button striking? You have a dedicated button for each limb. IMO, playing the Fight Night games I was much slower when throwing my punches because I was having to do full motions on the stick instead of being able to modify my strikes at the same time that I throw them.
I think EA MMA has the controls backwards. I like face button striking better than stick based, and I think the ground game is more realistic using the stick than a face button. It's not that easy in real life to pass guard by doing 1 thing. It's a progression to get from full to half guard. What I did like about EA's submission system was how they handled the RNC. By you using your stick to find the sweet spot. It just seemed like it took way too long in that position. I don't really like THQ's shine system either. There has to be a happy medium somewhere out there to represent submissions better.
I don't think EA MMA is gonna suck. But EA has been known to make only a decent product initially and make tiny improvements on it each year and call it a new game. I'm hoping that's not the case with this one. I'll probably buy it when it comes out regardless, just so I can play with the SF and Dream guys.