UFC 333: Volkanovski vs. Evloev

Based off his own criteria, his argument falls apart when he brings up Jordan.

Because the answer would actually be Bill Russell based off his criteria. Because he won 11 championships in 13 years with the Celtics, and he was unequivocally the best player on the Celtics during that time. In addition, he was the first player-coach (and technically the first Black NBA head coach too) and he won two of his titles in that role between 1966-1969 (something never done before or since).

He also had 5 MVPs in 13 years (during the same era Wilt played, same amount as Jordan in fewer years). And he probably would have a shitload of DPOY, except that award didn't exist when he played (averaged 22.5 rebounds per game over his CAREER and led the league in rebounding four times). He was also 10-0 in Game 7's, was a 12 All Star, and 11 time all NBA selection.

So by the criteria he gave, Bill Russell is the GOAT, not Jordan. Now, I personally think Jordan, but you have to give reasons outside of rings and accolades to get there. These youngins forget man...
I intentionally left Russell off, because I wanted this conversation to happen my good sir...


NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Russell is 11-1 in the finals. 11 rings sounds nice, YES, but there's a reason you don't call Royce Gracie the greatest fighter of all time, even though what he did at the time was incredible.. And why?

Russell was 11-1 during a time the NBA had 8 teams... and expanded to..... 14. (There's 30 teams now)

Russell had to beat 1 team (If you were the #1 team in your conference, you only had to win 1 game to make it to the finals) or 2, if he was in the #2 or #3 area... You only made the playoffs if you were in the top 3... of 8 teams... (Now the playoffs go to 8 teams for each conference, so 16 total.. WHICH IS MORE TEAMS IN THE PLAYOFFS NOW THAN WERE ON THE ROSTER)
Russell had the same revolving door of people to play against and still lost...

Imagine if Goat Jones had the same 8 people to fight.. over and over..
Or Jordan played the same 8 teams...

They played less games and had FAR less people to worry about.. Which goes back to the point of what I said "Fighting... is not the same as a sport where you can rely on someone else to take the load off for a moment... 1 mistake can cost you everything"

Now you know the same can be said for Basketball, in an era where he could ONLY be dominant, even Russell lost.. when it was at its easiest, 1 maybe 2 (hard-pressed to think of 3) people could compete with Russell during that time and he still LOST. 11-1.. There's still a 1.. and he was responsible for the loss, just like his team was.

Jordan is 6-0, against 30+ teams, no matter what.. there was never a loss.

Now I spoke about how accolades couldn't be touched.
Jordan (Even now with this point-stat padding era) has the highest PPG of all time
Most 30 points per game
Just got passed for most playoff points, but has the 2nd most playoff points with the least time and less shots/games in the playoffs

You mention the DPOY wasn't invented. That reward would belong to either Hakeem, Russell, Kareem or Wilt, easily. Jordan is an incredible defender, but they are 7 foot and above.. Jordan is only 6'6. It's incredible that during an era where Hakeem, Mark eaton and others were playing, knowing defense is literally their thing.

But I'm not asking who the better defender is... Who is the GREATEST PLAYER?! Like I said, Jordan. His accolades prove it. His individual and team accolades are too great, and show like I said earlier

"you look at rings, the amount of times they won/lossed, who they won against, how dominant were they in particular and how much of that dominance led to their team winning? When they touched the court, could you see a clear difference in skill between them and the other players? What individual accolades did they have? What titles were theirs alone along with mvp's"

Wilt winning 5 mvp's during that era makes me mad.. because you had a pick of 3 people...

Jordan winning mvp over... Hakeem, Barkley, Kemp, Magic, Bird, Drexler, Wilkins, Thomas, Stockton, Malone, Robinson, Ewing, etc.. Is amazing. And to do it.. 5 times. (We all know he should have like 10 but 5 is cool)

Individual accolades? Jordan has the most scoring titles, the most finals mvps, the most PPG all time, the most PPG playoff all-time, 3rd ALLTIME for steals of ANY position.

On stats the lead directly to winning (Scoring points) Jordan not only is the highest on the court, but he's the highest all time.

Rebounding is awesome, Blocking shots is cool as shit.. But did you block the ball from going in.. more times than it did go in? Does your team at the end of the game have more points than the other, and did your blocking contribute to that? If you lost.. then no. If you won, then yes. 11 times Russell made sure it worked.. and 1 time it didn't. Against the same team he's beaten before... 91.6% of the time it worked. 8.4% of the time.. it didn't.

Jordan 6 times made sure it worked... and 0 times it didn't.
100% of the time it worked. 0% doesn't need to be said.


Same goes with Goat Jones, he didn't have a tournament of random people off the street thinking they were good (gracie)... He fought people who did nothing but TRAIN to fight... and won... (You remember the era of 'THIS IS THE GUY TO BEAT JONES' then they lost and people hated them for losing or loved their effort and became fan favorites like Gus) Every time. What Gracie did grew the sport and made people focus. What Russell did, grew the NBA and got people to watch more (aside from the racist shit, not Magic, bird or Jordan levels of watching but got eyes),

Gracie's accomplishments cannot be appreciated more... BUT your competition was nowhere near... That of an average UFC fighter even 8 years after his tournament.

Russells accomplishments cannot be appreciated more.. BUT your competition were the same 8-14 teams you faced, we KNOW most weren't on your level and were just playing to play.. most had other jobs and played as a hobby, Jordan faced people who made it a career and still won.

Magic, Thomas, Drexler, Barkley, Ewing, Malone, Stockton, Payton, Miller, O'Neal, Mourning, Hardaway, Wilkins, Webber, Worthy, Dumars, Parish, Price, etc... These are just SOME of the players Jordan beat in the playoffs. Just a quick glance at that list.. and there's 3 people.. in EVERYONE'S top 10. 5 in top 15. Like I said, it's "Who you beat"

To be greater than someone, you need to beat not only them but their legacy.
Someone would need to go perfect in the finals, while also going 7-0 or higher,
while getting finals mvp's the entire time,
more than 5 regular season mvp's,
more than 10 scoring championships,
a DPOY,
either 3 3 peats or 7 straight,
beat legends upon legends, do it while maintaining the air of invicibility Jordan had,
Ending your career with the most PPG,
Ending your career with the most Playoff PPG,
that's just a small amount AND you have to do it in less time than Jordan did.

^
That's why it's not possible. You can't beat that.. and yet that's what Jordan is. Jordan IS the 6-0 with 6 finals mvps. Jordan IS the 2 3 peat, jordan IS the man with 10 scoring championships, Jordan IS the man with 5 mvp's and a DPOY, etc.. That's legacy.

Just like to beat Goat Jones legacy, you would need to

Become the youngest champion ever,
defeat the most undefeated fighters ever,
have the highest takedown defense,
never get knocked down,
never get rocked,
beat people at their own style,
remain undefeated,
have the most title fight wins,
have the most title defenses,
Basically have a decade where you were champion through it
(No bs, from 2011, to 2020, Jones was champion, every year)
Move up in weight, dominating the most dangerous fighter who will eventually become champion,
beat the greatest of that division's history,
defend your belt in another weight class,
Defeat the most champions/former champions ever,
etc...

That is why their legacy is too much to topple. How do you do the things Jordan and Goat Jones do? GOATS
 
well shoot! can't find my glasses. I gotta enlarge this so I can read it properly

I intentionally left Russell off, because I wanted this conversation to happen my good sir...


NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Russell is 11-1 in the finals. 11 rings sounds nice, YES, but there's a reason you don't call Royce Gracie the greatest fighter of all time, even though what he did at the time was incredible.. And why?

Russell was 11-1 during a time the NBA had 8 teams... and expanded to..... 14. (There's 30 teams now)

Russell had to beat 1 team (If you were the #1 team in your conference, you only had to win 1 game to make it to the finals) or 2, if he was in the #2 or #3 area... You only made the playoffs if you were in the top 3... of 8 teams... (Now the playoffs go to 8 teams for each conference, so 16 total.. WHICH IS MORE TEAMS IN THE PLAYOFFS NOW THAN WERE ON THE ROSTER)
Russell had the same revolving door of people to play against and still lost...

Imagine if Goat Jones had the same 8 people to fight.. over and over..
Or Jordan played the same 8 teams...

They played less games and had FAR less people to worry about.. Which goes back to the point of what I said "Fighting... is not the same as a sport where you can rely on someone else to take the load off for a moment... 1 mistake can cost you everything"

Now you know the same can be said for Basketball, in an era where he could ONLY be dominant, even Russell lost.. when it was at its easiest, 1 maybe 2 (hard-pressed to think of 3) people could compete with Russell during that time and he still LOST. 11-1.. There's still a 1.. and he was responsible for the loss, just like his team was.

Jordan is 6-0, against 30+ teams, no matter what.. there was never a loss.

Now I spoke about how accolades couldn't be touched.
Jordan (Even now with this point-stat padding era) has the highest PPG of all time
Most 30 points per game
Just got passed for most playoff points, but has the 2nd most playoff points with the least time and less shots/games in the playoffs

You mention the DPOY wasn't invented. That reward would belong to either Hakeem, Russell, Kareem or Wilt, easily. Jordan is an incredible defender, but they are 7 foot and above.. Jordan is only 6'6. It's incredible that during an era where Hakeem, Mark eaton and others were playing, knowing defense is literally their thing.

But I'm not asking who the better defender is... Who is the GREATEST PLAYER?! Like I said, Jordan. His accolades prove it. His individual and team accolades are too great, and show like I said earlier

"you look at rings, the amount of times they won/lossed, who they won against, how dominant were they in particular and how much of that dominance led to their team winning? When they touched the court, could you see a clear difference in skill between them and the other players? What individual accolades did they have? What titles were theirs alone along with mvp's"

Wilt winning 5 mvp's during that era makes me mad.. because you had a pick of 3 people...

Jordan winning mvp over... Hakeem, Barkley, Kemp, Magic, Bird, Drexler, Wilkins, Thomas, Stockton, Malone, Robinson, Ewing, etc.. Is amazing. And to do it.. 5 times. (We all know he should have like 10 but 5 is cool)

Individual accolades? Jordan has the most scoring titles, the most finals mvps, the most PPG all time, the most PPG playoff all-time, 3rd ALLTIME for steals of ANY position.

On stats the lead directly to winning (Scoring points) Jordan not only is the highest on the court, but he's the highest all time.

Rebounding is awesome, Blocking shots is cool as shit.. But did you block the ball from going in.. more times than it did go in? Does your team at the end of the game have more points than the other, and did your blocking contribute to that? If you lost.. then no. If you won, then yes. 11 times Russell made sure it worked.. and 1 time it didn't. Against the same team he's beaten before... 91.6% of the time it worked. 8.4% of the time.. it didn't.

Jordan 6 times made sure it worked... and 0 times it didn't.
100% of the time it worked. 0% doesn't need to be said.


Same goes with Goat Jones, he didn't have a tournament of random people off the street thinking they were good (gracie)... He fought people who did nothing but TRAIN to fight... and won... (You remember the era of 'THIS IS THE GUY TO BEAT JONES' then they lost and people hated them for losing or loved their effort and became fan favorites like Gus) Every time. What Gracie did grew the sport and made people focus. What Russell did, grew the NBA and got people to watch more (aside from the racist shit, not Magic, bird or Jordan levels of watching but got eyes),

Gracie's accomplishments cannot be appreciated more... BUT your competition was nowhere near... That of an average UFC fighter even 8 years after his tournament.

Russells accomplishments cannot be appreciated more.. BUT your competition were the same 8-14 teams you faced, we KNOW most weren't on your level and were just playing to play.. most had other jobs and played as a hobby, Jordan faced people who made it a career and still won.

Magic, Thomas, Drexler, Barkley, Ewing, Malone, Stockton, Payton, Miller, O'Neal, Mourning, Hardaway, Wilkins, Webber, Worthy, Dumars, Parish, Price, etc... These are just SOME of the players Jordan beat in the playoffs. Just a quick glance at that list.. and there's 3 people.. in EVERYONE'S top 10. 5 in top 15. Like I said, it's "Who you beat"

To be greater than someone, you need to beat not only them but their legacy.
Someone would need to go perfect in the finals, while also going 7-0 or higher,
while getting finals mvp's the entire time,
more than 5 regular season mvp's,
more than 10 scoring championships,
a DPOY,
either 3 3 peats or 7 straight,
beat legends upon legends, do it while maintaining the air of invicibility Jordan had,
Ending your career with the most PPG,
Ending your career with the most Playoff PPG,
that's just a small amount AND you have to do it in less time than Jordan did.

^
That's why it's not possible. You can't beat that.. and yet that's what Jordan is. Jordan IS the 6-0 with 6 finals mvps. Jordan IS the 2 3 peat, jordan IS the man with 10 scoring championships, Jordan IS the man with 5 mvp's and a DPOY, etc.. That's legacy.

Just like to beat Goat Jones legacy, you would need to

Become the youngest champion ever,
defeat the most undefeated fighters ever,
have the highest takedown defense,
never get knocked down,
never get rocked,
beat people at their own style,
remain undefeated,
have the most title fight wins,
have the most title defenses,
Basically have a decade where you were champion through it
(No bs, from 2011, to 2020, Jones was champion, every year)
Move up in weight, dominating the most dangerous fighter who will eventually become champion,
beat the greatest of that division's history,
defend your belt in another weight class,
Defeat the most champions/former champions ever,
etc...

That is why their legacy is too much to topple. How do you do the things Jordan and Goat Jones do? GOATS
 
I'm not going into all of this but when he lost before the finals that doesn't show up in "6-0" so "he didn't lose" yes he did and earlier
Yeah but those are regular season games, where you need a certain amount of 'wins' to make it into the playoffs.

We're speaking about the finals, when EVERYTHING is done, and the TWO BEST TEAMS are going at it.. Jordan was never on the losing team. 6 times he was in the finals and 6 times he won.

Russell went 12 times and lost once.
 
Here let me translate it into French:


أنا تعمدت ترك راسل خارج النقاش، لأنني أردت أن يحدث هذا الحوار يا سيدي الطيب...

الآن!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

راسل 11-1 في النهائيات. 11 بطولة تبدو جميلة، نعم، لكن هناك سبب يمنعك من تسمية رويس غرايسي أعظم مقاتل على الإطلاق، رغم أن ما فعله في وقته كان مذهلاً.. ولماذا؟

راسل كان 11-1 في زمن كانت فيه الـNBA تتكون من 8 فرق... ثم توسعت إلى..... 14. (واليوم هناك 30 فريقاً)

كان راسل يحتاج فقط إلى هزيمة فريق واحد (إذا كنت الفريق رقم 1 في مؤتمرك، كنت تحتاج فقط إلى الفوز بمباراة واحدة للوصول إلى النهائيات) أو اثنين، إذا كان في المركز الثاني أو الثالث... كنت تدخل التصفيات فقط إذا كنت ضمن الثلاثة الأوائل... من 8 فرق... (الآن التصفيات تصل إلى 8 فرق لكل مؤتمر، أي 16 فريقاً إجمالاً.. وهذا أكثر من عدد الفرق التي كانت في الدوري كله آنذاك)

راسل كان يواجه نفس المجموعة المتكررة من الخصوم وخسر رغم ذلك...

تخيل لو أن غوت جونز كان يواجه نفس الـ8 أشخاص مراراً وتكراراً..
أو لو أن جوردان لعب ضد نفس الـ8 فرق...

كانوا يلعبون مباريات أقل ويواجهون عدداً أقل بكثير من الخصوم.. وهذا يعود إلى النقطة التي ذكرتها: "القتال... ليس مثل رياضة يمكنك الاعتماد فيها على شخص آخر ليحمل العبء لحظة... خطأ واحد يمكن أن يكلفك كل شيء"

والآن تعلم أن الشيء نفسه ينطبق على كرة السلة، في عصر كان بإمكانه فقط أن يكون مهيمناً، وحتى راسل خسر.. عندما كان الأمر في أسهل حالاته، شخص واحد أو اثنان (من الصعب التفكير في ثلاثة) كانوا يستطيعون منافسة راسل في ذلك الوقت ومع ذلك خسر. 11-1.. لا يزال هناك 1.. وكان مسؤولاً عن تلك الخسارة، تماماً كما كان فريقه.

جوردان 6-0، ضد أكثر من 30 فريقاً، مهما كان الأمر.. لم تكن هناك خسارة أبداً.

تحدثت سابقاً عن كيف أن الإنجازات لا يمكن المساس بها.
جوردان (حتى الآن في عصر تضخيم النقاط هذا) يملك أعلى معدل نقاط في المباراة على الإطلاق
أكثر عدد من المواسم بمعدل 30 نقطة
تم تجاوزه مؤخراً في إجمالي نقاط التصفيات، لكنه الثاني بأكبر عدد من النقاط في التصفيات بأقل وقت وأ وبعدد أقل من التسديدات/المباريات في التصفيات

تذكر أن جائزة أفضل مدافع لم تكن موجودة بعد. تلك الجائزة كانت ستذهب بسهولة إلى حكيم أو راسل أو كريم أو ويلت. جوردان مدافع مذهل، لكن هؤلاء طوالهم 7 أقدام فما فوق.. جوردان فقط 6'6. من المذهل أنه في عصر كان يلعب فيه حكيم ومارك إيتون وآخرون، والذين كانت الدفاع حرفياً تخصصهم.

لكنني لا أسأل من أفضل المدافع... من هو أعظم لاعب؟! كما قلت، جوردان. إنجازاته تثبت ذلك. إنجازاته الفردية والجماعية عظيمة جداً، وتظهر كما قلت سابقاً:

"تنظر إلى البطولات، عدد مرات الفوز والخسارة، ضد من فازوا، مدى هيمنتهم تحديداً، وإلى أي مدى أدت تلك الهيمنة إلى فوز فريقهم؟ عندما كانوا يلمسون الملعب، هل كنت ترى فرقاً واضحاً في المهارة بينهم وبين اللاعبين الآخرين؟ ما الإنجازات الفردية التي حققوها؟ ما الألقاب التي كانت ملكهم وحدهم إلى جانب الـMVP؟"

فوز ويلت بـ5 جوائز MVP في ذلك العصر يغضبني.. لأنك كنت تختار من بين 3 أشخاص فقط...

أما فوز جوردان بالـMVP على حساب... حكيم، باركلي، كيمب، ماجيك، بيرد، دريكسلر، ويلكنز، توماس، ستوكتون، مالون، روبنسون، يوينغ، إلخ.. فهذا مذهل. وأن يفعل ذلك.. 5 مرات. (كلنا نعرف أنه كان يستحق حوالي 10 لكن 5 جيدة)

الإنجازات الفردية؟ جوردان يملك أكبر عدد من ألقاب التهديف، وأكبر عدد من جوائز MVP للنهائيات، وأعلى معدل نقاط في التاريخ، وأعلى معدل نقاط في التصفيات على الإطلاق، والثالث في التاريخ في السرقة لأي مركز.

في الإحصائيات التي تؤدي مباشرة إلى الفوز (تسجيل النقاط) جوردان ليس فقط الأعلى على أرض الملعب، بل هو الأعلى على الإطلاق.

الارتدادات رائعة، وحجب التسديدات رائع جداً.. لكن هل حجبت الكرة من الدخول أكثر مما دخلت؟ هل كان لدى فريقك في نهاية المباراة نقاط أكثر من الخصم، وهل ساهم حجبك في ذلك؟ إذا خسرت.. فالإجابة لا. إذا فزت، فالإجابة نعم. 11 مرة ضمن راسل أن الأمر نجح.. ومرة واحدة لم ينجح. ضد نفس الفريق الذي هزمه من قبل... 91.6% من الوقت نجح. 8.4% من الوقت.. لم ينجح.

جوردان 6 مرات ضمن أن الأمر نجح... و0 مرات لم ينجح.
100% من الوقت نجح. 0% لا تحتاج إلى قولها.

الأمر نفسه ينطبق على غوت جونز، لم يكن لديه بطولة من أشخاص عشوائيين من الشارع يعتقدون أنهم جيدون (غرايسي)... بل قاتل أناساً لم يفعلوا شيئاً سوى التدريب على القتال... وفاز... (أتذكر عصر "هذا هو الرجل الذي سيهزم جونز" ثم خسروا وأصبح الناس يكرهونهم لخسارتهم أو يحبون جهدهم وأصبحوا مفضلين مثل غوس) في كل مرة. ما فعله غرايسي نمّى الرياضة وجعل الناس يركزون. ما فعله راسل نمّى الـNBA وجعل الناس يشاهدون أكثر (بعيداً عن العنصرية، وليس بمستوى ماجيك أو بيرد أو جوردان في المشاهدة لكنه جذب العيون)،

إنجازات غرايسي لا يمكن تقديرها أكثر... لكن منافسيه لم يكونوا قريبين أبداً... من مستوى مقاتل UFC عادي حتى بعد 8 سنوات من بطولته.

إنجازات راسل لا يمكن تقديرها أكثر.. لكن منافسيه كانوا نفس الـ8-14 فريقاً التي واجهها، نحن نعرف أن معظمهم لم يكونوا في مستواه وكانوا يلعبون لمجرد اللعب.. معظمهم كان لديهم وظائف أخرى ويلعبون كهواية، جوردان واجه أناساً جعلوا ذلك مهنة وما زال فاز.

ماجيك، توماس، دريكسلر، باركلي، يوينغ، مالون، ستوكتون، بايتون، ميلر، أونيل، مورنينغ، هاردواي، ويلكنز، ويبر، وورثي، دومارس، باريش، برايس، إلخ... هؤلاء مجرد بعض اللاعبين الذين هزمهم جوردان في التصفيات. نظرة سريعة على هذه القائمة.. وهناك 3 أشخاص.. في قائمة أفضل 10 لدى الجميع. و5 في أفضل 15. كما قلت، الأمر يتعلق بـ"من هزمت"

لكي تكون أعظم من شخص ما، تحتاج إلى هزيمته هو وإرثه.
يحتاج أحدهم إلى أن يكون مثالياً في النهائيات، مع ذهاب 7-0 أو أعلى،
مع الفوز بـMVP النهائيات طوال الوقت،
أكثر من 5 جوائز MVP للموسم العادي،
أكثر من 10 ألقاب تهديف،
جائزة أفضل مدافع،
إما 3 ثلاثيات متتالية أو 7 على التوالي،
هزيمة أساطير فوق أساطير، والقيام بذلك مع الحفاظ على هالة عدم القابلية للهزيمة التي كانت لدى جوردان،
إنهاء مسيرته بأعلى معدل نقاط،
إنهاء مسيرته بأعلى معدل نقاط في التصفيات،
وهذا مجرد جزء صغير ويجب أن يفعله في وقت أقل مما فعله جوردان.

^
لهذا السبب الأمر غير ممكن. لا يمكنك التغلب على ذلك.. ومع ذلك هذا هو جوردان. جوردان هو الـ6-0 مع 6 جوائز MVP للنهائيات. جوردان هو صاحب الثلاثيتين، جوردان هو الرجل صاحب 10 ألقاب تهديف، جوردان هو الرجل صاحب 5 MVP وجائزة أفضل مدافع، إلخ.. هذا هو الإرث.

تماماً كما أن التغلب على إرث غوت جونز يتطلب أن:

تصبح أصغر بطل على الإطلاق،
تهزم أكبر عدد من المقاتلين غير المهزومين،
تمتلك أعلى دفاع عن الإطاحة،
لا تُسقط أبداً،
لا تُهز أبداً،
تهزم الناس بأسلوبهم الخاص،
تبقى غير مهزوم،
تمتلك أكبر عدد من انتصارات نزال اللقب،
تمتلك أكبر عدد من الدفاعات عن اللقب،
أساساً تملك عقداً كاملاً كنت فيه بطلاً طوال الوقت
(بلا كلام فارغ، من 2011 إلى 2020، كان جونز بطلاً كل عام)
ترتقي في الوزن، وتهيمن على أخطر مقاتل سيصبح بطلاً في النهاية،
تهزم أعظم تاريخ ذلك الوزن،
تدافع عن حزامك في وزن آخر،
تهزم أكبر عدد من الأبطال/الأبطال السابقين،
إلخ...

لهذا السبب إرثهما أكبر من أن يُقلب. كيف تفعل الأشياء التي يفعلها جوردان وغوت جونز؟ إنهما الـGOATS.
 
Yeah but those are regular season games, where you need a certain amount of 'wins' to make it into the playoffs.

We're speaking about the finals, when EVERYTHING is done, and the TWO BEST TEAMS are going at it.. Jordan was never on the losing team. 6 times he was in the finals and 6 times he won.

Russell went 12 times and lost once.

Eli Manning went to the Super Bowl twice and won twice. Tom Brady went ten times and won seven times.

#GoatEli
 
Other accolades brother. Mvp's, etc.. I typed a lot... I'm tired.

SE8e4T.gif


Hope you're enjoying the married life, bro!
 
Yeah but those are regular season games, where you need a certain amount of 'wins' to make it into the playoffs.

We're speaking about the finals, when EVERYTHING is done, and the TWO BEST TEAMS are going at it.. Jordan was never on the losing team. 6 times he was in the finals and 6 times he won.

Russell went 12 times and lost once.
I was talking about the playoffs

Since when losing before the finals means you can just ignore it
 
Banana skin GOAT Pico! LFG.
Modern warfare throwback take any fight Kavanagh LFG.
No FKN clue if he's even a fighter but my mate is a fan Evloev LFG.
Petr Yan LFG before you get arrested for torturing animals.
Bellator champ and hilarious comedic interviewer/ee Volkov LFG.
Dom Reyes chin LFG.
On the whole LFG.
 
Banana skin GOAT Pico! LFG.
Modern warfare throwback take any fight Kavanagh LFG.
No FKN clue if he's even a fighter but my mate is a fan Evloev LFG.
Petr Yan LFG before you get arrested for torturing animals.
Bellator champ and hilarious comedic interviewer/ee Volkov LFG.
Dom Reyes chin LFG.
On the whole LFG.
Hold up, what yan do?
 
But the era it happened in matters!

Unless it doesn't support my argument. Then it's irrelevant and solely the number of accolades.
2 vs 7 is not an argument.

Brady is also 7-3 in the finals, also brady has the MOST superbowl rings, with the least losses. Same argument, different sport.
Most rings, less losses. Same argument, don't flip 1 thing and think it changes.

My argument was
"you look at rings, the amount of times they won/lossed, who they won against, how dominant were they in particular and how much of that dominance led to their team winning? When they touched the court, could you see a clear difference in skill between them and the other players? What individual accolades did they have? What titles were theirs alone along with mvp's"

Nowhere did I just say rings alone. Then I spoke about beating their legacy along with their records.

Rings alone was not the argument, which is why i attacked the russell 11-1 ring argument.

Let's not pick and choose what we're seeing now. It's right there.
 
2 vs 7 is not an argument.

Brady is also 7-3 in the finals, also brady has the MOST superbowl rings, with the least losses. Same argument, different sport.
Most rings, less losses. Same argument, don't flip 1 thing and think it changes.

My argument was
"you look at rings, the amount of times they won/lossed, who they won against, how dominant were they in particular and how much of that dominance led to their team winning? When they touched the court, could you see a clear difference in skill between them and the other players? What individual accolades did they have? What titles were theirs alone along with mvp's"

Nowhere did I just say rings alone. Then I spoke about beating their legacy along with their records.

Rings alone was not the argument, which is why i attacked the russell 11-1 ring argument.

Let's not pick and choose what we're seeing now. It's right there.
Yeah and you shift the goalposts of your own argument

Elgin Baylor, Jerry West, Wilt Chamberlain, Bob Petit, Dolph Schayes, etc etc. but you excluded all of those stars Russel.beat, who were obviously quite good because they helped make and grow the league. I mean, Jerry West is the logo. But because they didn't fit your narrative you excluded them.

Clear difference in skill? Russell revolutionized defense. Before him big men were supposed to stay planted. But because he had a high jump background to become a shot blocker and jump start fast breaks. He revolutionized a position. And, ya know, the whole player coach thing stands out.

I already gave Russells individual accolades, they're the same or better than Jordans. Let's not pick and choose what we're seeing. It's right there. You can't make an argument for Jordan having a title "on his own" because anytime he was "on his own" he got bounced by the Pistons. Same with Russell, he had Cousy and such. But that pesky player coach thing gives Russell the edge again, he won two titles in that role.

By all of those metrics you provided, Russell is equal to or greater than Jordan.

The only argument against Russell is era, which I happen to agree with. But that isn't a thing you brought up until it was pointed out you hadn't followed your own arguments logic.
 
Yeah and you shift the goalposts of your own argument

Elgin Baylor, Jerry West, Wilt Chamberlain, Bob Petit, Dolph Schayes, etc etc. but you excluded all of those stars Russel.beat, who were obviously quite good because they helped make and grow the league. I mean, Jerry West is the logo. But because they didn't fit your narrative you excluded them.

Clear difference in skill? Russell revolutionized defense. Before him big men were supposed to stay planted. But because he had a high jump background to become a shot blocker and jump start fast breaks. He revolutionized a position. And, ya know, the whole player coach thing stands out.

I already gave Russells individual accolades, they're the same or better than Jordans. Let's not pick and choose what we're seeing. It's right there. You can't make an argument for Jordan having a title "on his own" because anytime he was "on his own" he got bounced by the Pistons. Same with Russell, he had Cousy and such. But that pesky player coach thing gives Russell the edge again, he won two titles in that role.

By all of those metrics you provided, Russell is equal to or greater than Jordan.

The only argument against Russell is era, which I happen to agree with. But that isn't a thing you brought up until it was pointed out you hadn't followed your own arguments logic.
List them,

I'll go accolade for accolade for you, since you think we're going 'around' the argument and I'm not supporting by literally saying what I've already said, so we'll end it here.

List all the achievement russell has done that has impressed you and I'll counter it, since for some reason that's not resonating or getting lost in translation somehow.

The floor is yours.
 
Back
Top