WAR

So, they're just doing an end around the war powers act, like we called three+ weeks ago.
I think Greta needs to send a flotilla of mute prostitutes to the gulf and have them stage their boats in the Straight of Whore Mutes
 
cliff notes?

that journalist is in the nucleus of group think hypnotism.
I let AI summarize, it's deeper than that but this will do

The criticism centers on a New York Times op-ed by Nicholas Kristof that accuses Israel of systemic sexual violence such as dogs trained to rape prisoners, based on unverified, anonymous testimonies and reports from biased, Hamas-affiliated NGOs.

Critics argue the piece relies on conspiratorial fabrications to draw a false moral equivalence between Israel and Hamas,. Crucially, they charge that the column's publication was intentionally timed to coincide with the release of a 300-page, meticulously documented report on Hamas's weaponized and organized sexual crimes, serving as a calculated media distraction designed to dilute the impact of those findings and shift public focus away from Hamas's atrocities.

Furthermore, critics accuse The New York Times of a severe one-sided bias, arguing that the paper consistently abandons standard journalistic rigor and fails to properly fact-check inflammatory, anti-Israel narratives when they align with an established ideological script.
 
Israel strikes Gaza City building targeting Hamas military leader Izz al-Din al-Haddad

Israel struck a residential building in Gaza City’s Rimal neighborhood, targeting Hamas military leader Izz al-Din al-Haddad; His fate is unclear, but officials cite 'initial indications' of success

 
I let AI summarize, it's deeper than that but this will do

The criticism centers on a New York Times op-ed by Nicholas Kristof that accuses Israel of systemic sexual violence such as dogs trained to rape prisoners, based on unverified, anonymous testimonies and reports from biased, Hamas-affiliated NGOs.

Critics argue the piece relies on conspiratorial fabrications to draw a false moral equivalence between Israel and Hamas,. Crucially, they charge that the column's publication was intentionally timed to coincide with the release of a 300-page, meticulously documented report on Hamas's weaponized and organized sexual crimes, serving as a calculated media distraction designed to dilute the impact of those findings and shift public focus away from Hamas's atrocities.

Furthermore, critics accuse The New York Times of a severe one-sided bias, arguing that the paper consistently abandons standard journalistic rigor and fails to properly fact-check inflammatory, anti-Israel narratives when they align with an established ideological script.
it's been all over then news here for days. Fuck the NYT. They had the time and the money to investigate this but chose to front page an opinion piece on he said/she said information. Total unsubstantiated hit piece authored by a bitch with 2 Pulitzer Prizes.
 
it's been all over then news here for days. Fuck the NYT. They had the time and the money to investigate this but chose to front page an opinion piece on he said/she said information. Total unsubstantiated hit piece authored by a bitch with 2 Pulitzer Prizes.
I miss what the NYT used to be. That was my favorite newspaper once upon a time....
 
it's been all over then news here for days. Fuck the NYT. They had the time and the money to investigate this but chose to front page an opinion piece on he said/she said information. Total unsubstantiated hit piece authored by a bitch with 2 Pulitzer Prizes.
And what Hamas actually filmed themselves doing they failed to mentioned for more than 24 hours after it was released while they went with their story
 
And what Hamas actually filmed themselves doing they failed to mentioned for more than 24 hours after it was released while they went with their story
as I understood it they released this trash the day before that evidence-based piece was to be released. to muddy the water. out this way the extreme left STILL denies the sexual crimes committed by Hamas. There's no doubt in their mind that those were AI deep fake vids...
 
I miss what the NYT used to be. That was my favorite newspaper once upon a time....
They refer to just that in the video

In the video, the discussion regarding the changes in the New York Times standards and editorial staff occurs around the [19:58] mark.

During this segment, guest Matti Friedman and host Dan Senor explore how controversial claims get published. They explicitly discuss the shift in newsroom dynamics over the last 10 to 20 years, noting that the "adults in the room" have largely left. Specifically, they highlight the forced firing of the former New York Times opinion editor, James Bennett, following a staff uprising over a conservative op-ed. They argue that this event marked a structural shift, replacing traditional journalistic vetting with more activist-driven editorial standards [20:38].
 
They refer to just that in the video

In the video, the discussion regarding the changes in the New York Times standards and editorial staff occurs around the [19:58] mark.

During this segment, guest Matti Friedman and host Dan Senor explore how controversial claims get published. They explicitly discuss the shift in newsroom dynamics over the last 10 to 20 years, noting that the "adults in the room" have largely left. Specifically, they highlight the forced firing of the former New York Times opinion editor, James Bennett, following a staff uprising over a conservative op-ed. They argue that this event marked a structural shift, replacing traditional journalistic vetting with more activist-driven editorial standards [20:38].
I started reading the NYT daily starting in 2001. It was somewhere between 2012 and 2015 I noticed the changes, and it was very gradual at first. By the time I completely stopped reading around 2016, the paper was a parody of its former self.
 
Israel strikes Gaza City building targeting Hamas military leader Izz al-Din al-Haddad

Israel struck a residential building in Gaza City’s Rimal neighborhood, targeting Hamas military leader Izz al-Din al-Haddad; His fate is unclear, but officials cite 'initial indications' of success

IDF Confirms: Izz al-Din Haddad Killed in Gaza Strike

The IDF Spokesperson, together with the Shin Bet spokesperson, confirmed the elimination of Hamas military wing commander Izz al-Din Haddad in an airstrike in Gaza. Earlier, Hamas also confirmed his death, and his funeral procession set out in the Strip.


'Every dog has its day, and you were a real bitch': Ex-hostages hail strike on Hamas chief Haddad

Freed hostages Liri Albag and Emily Damari say Izz al-Din al-Haddad held them in Hamas tunnels and helped plan their abductions; Israel says it targeted the Gaza chief and October 7 architect in a Gaza City strike, as Hamas prepares to choose a new political leader

 
Why would the NY Times make such horrific claims about Israel? The reasons are several-fold

By Douglas Murray

Nicholas Kristof raped my dog. At least that is what I have heard, from an anonymous source. A source who is intensely hostile to the New York Times columnist. And that’s good enough for me. Now I come to think of it, my pet pug has had a strange look on his face lately.

As it happens, the rumor that I have just attempted to spread is far less lurid and fanciful than the one that the New York Times chose to spread around the world this week.

In a piece that has already been widely debunked, Kristof claimed that Israeli prison guards routinely use rape as a method of torture on Palestinian prisoners. The piece portrayed Israeli prison guards and soldiers as rapists, sadists and akin to Nazi prison camp guards. Perhaps even worse.

Kristof’s most grotesque claim is based on an anonymous source who is described as a “journalist” from Gaza. According to this source, while being held in an Israeli prison in 2024, the Gazan man was stripped naked, blindfolded and handcuffed. Then “a dog was summoned.” The dog’s handler — who we are helpfully told was speaking Hebrew — then encouraged the dog to “mount him.”

...

 
Back
Top