News Thread

And, as was stated previously, this is simply not who we are. America is not a nation that makes public spectacles of executions. We are a nation of laws, not vengeance.
This part I do agree. These things should be done behind close doors where the victims' kin can get their closure and see the bastard dead.

I don't agree that there will be an immediate retaliation to this. And yes, they do seek death, but a good death in their eyes.

Why did ISIS engage in crucifixtion when there is much easier ways to kill someone?
 
I don't agree that there will be an immediate retaliation to this. And yes, they do seek death, but a good death in their eyes.
There will be the second there is an opportunity. If the right Jihadi John with a camera and a flair for the dramatic has an opportunity to drag an American or two into a dungeon....there will be blood.

I do not see any upside to shooting this piece of shit on camera.


Why did ISIS engage in crucifixtion when there is much easier ways to kill someone?
Attention. And because they think it will frighten and intimidate the West.
 
There will be the second there is an opportunity. If the right Jihadi John with a camera and a flair for the dramatic has an opportunity to drag an American or two into a dungeon....there will be blood.

I do not see any upside to shooting this piece of shit on camera.



Attention. And because they think it will frighten and intimidate the West.
Point 1, they don't need this execution to do that, and this execution wont move to needle much in speeding up their timetable to do it.

Point 2, not just the West. Anyone. Which means that public execution and spectacle is something Arabs would be terrified of.

I am not for making this public, but I don't see this being a major needle mover in Islamic terrorism. More so ammo for Putin to point at us next time he has the next Navalny killed.
 
France unrest: How the Palestinian cause became fuel for political chaos

Opinion: Pro-Palestinian mobilization, Islamist anger and far-left organization have converged into a volatile force as France’s political center weakens and unrest spreads

 
I am not for making this public
Well, then we're mostly in agreement. My beef here is with televising this. I'm not morally opposed to the death penalty in his case; not at all. I just feel that ADX is not only a worse fate, I do also strongly feel it is a far better deterrent.


but I don't see this being a major needle mover in Islamic terrorism.
I'm not saying it will cause huge rises in terrorism. But if even one American is killed on camera as a direct result of this, it is not worth it. I don't see any upside.
Which means that public execution and spectacle is something Arabs would be terrified of.
This is where we fundamentally disagree. I don't believe even 1% that they would be terrified of this. I have never heard that this is a major cultural thing over there. And on top of that, Arabs and other Muslim majority populations are brutalized far worse by their own leaders. A clean, clinical execution with minimal suffering is simply not a deterrent. Especially not if they believe that execution is a mere stepping stone to eternal paradise and a favorable disposition with an all powerful god. I just don't believe that.
 
This is where we fundamentally disagree. I don't believe even 1% that they would be terrified of this. I have never heard that this is a major cultural thing over there. And on top of that, Arabs and other Muslim majority populations are brutalized far worse by their own leaders. A clean, clinical execution with minimal suffering is simply not a deterrent. Especially not if they believe that execution is a mere stepping stone to eternal paradise and a favorable disposition with an all powerful god. I just don't believe that.
Agreed, if the nation doing the executing was a Muslim nation, and not one run by infidels.

If Ben Gvir dragged Marwan Barghouti or w.e his name is outside and had him publicly stoned, it will harden a few hardliners, absolutely, but a lot of the younger 'potential recruits' will see that and say 'fuck that, I don't want to get executed by an infidel and have that on the internet forever'.
 
They will then respond to that humiliation with revenge. As I said, there will be future Americans who will now suffer because of this choice. People will be abducted specifically to fill this role.

I do not believe there is any deterrent factor whatsoever. These people seek death and they seem to be remembered. We are doing their work for them. No, the best thing to do with them is exactly what happened to Dzhokhar. Life in ADX, with occasional stories released about how terrible the conditions are there, will be a far better deterrent. Rotting in Gitmo is equally as bad. There is no way that is a preferred fate to public martyrdom.

I vigorously and strongly - nay, I aggressively disagree with this public execution. This is a terrible idea with no upside. I do not believe there will be even a tiny deterrent effect. There are only negatives for us if we go down this path. And needless suffering will be inflicted on innocent Americans because of it.
Exactly. They are a death cult who worships death more than we worship life (by their own admission). Getting executed on live TV by the Americans is probably about the highest honor we can award to one of these fucksticks. Instant and eternal martyrdom.

Very disappointing that the supposed experts in these type of Middle East relations still don't get it. Or, even worse, they get it but are pandering to the salivating masses who think this is dope, in order to garner a few votes.
 
Agreed, if the nation doing the executing was a Muslim nation, and not one run by infidels.

If Ben Gvir dragged Marwan Barghouti or w.e his name is outside and had him publicly stoned, it will harden a few hardliners, absolutely, but a lot of the younger 'potential recruits' will see that and say 'fuck that, I don't want to get executed by an infidel and have that on the internet forever'.
We will have to agree to disagree, particularly on your last sentence. I don't believe a young, aspiring Jihadi has any care for what happens on the Internet after he has his 72 virgins in eternal paradise. But, I always respect your thoughts.
200w.gif
 
Getting executed on live TV by the Americans is probably about the highest honor we can award to one of these fucksticks. Instant and eternal martyrdom.
This, this, this. Jawbone and I are on opposite ends of that idea, but I wholeheartedly agree. I would be willing to bet that Nidal whateverthefuckhisnameis thanked Allah for this public execution. I feel like for an aspiring Jihadi, this is the best possible outcome.
 
This, this, this. Jawbone and I are on opposite ends of that idea, but I wholeheartedly agree. I would be willing to bet that Nidal whateverthefuckhisnameis thanked Allah for this public execution. I feel like for an aspiring Jihadi, this is the best possible outcome.
I think that Muslims and Christians have different ideas of what martyrdom look like, and radical Muslims do care on some level how they look when they go. Like the Imperial Japanese fighting to the death because being captured and beheaded by an enemy force and specifically a non-Japanese would be a great shame on their family honor.

But yeah, agree to disagree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABB
Not surprised he's become jihadist in Australia

Flydubai co-pilot planned 9/11-style suicide strike on Ben Gurion Airport, UAE says

UAE attorney general says 29-year-old Omani suspect began radicalizing in 2017, pursued aviation career to carry out terror plot and confessed to acting alone; investigators continue probing possible accomplices and security failures

The Omani co-pilot who attempted to take control of a Flydubai passenger jet bound for Israel last week planned to crash the aircraft into the passenger terminal at Ben Gurion Airport in a suicide attack inspired by the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United Arab Emirates' attorney general revealed Friday.

The 29-year-old suspect, identified in previous reports as Hamam al-Hammami, had used two earlier flights to Tel Aviv to study the route and airport before attempting to carry out his plan on September 30, according to findings released by UAE Attorney General Hamad Saif Al Shamsi. Investigators said the intended attack was designed to cause the greatest possible loss of life.

Radicalization began in 2017, investigators say
According to the UAE investigation, the suspect's radicalization began in 2017 while he was studying in Australia, where he became increasingly exposed to extremist literature and online material glorifying terrorist organizations and suicide attacks.

Investigators said he was particularly influenced by the September 11 attacks in the United States, which involved hijacked passenger aircraft being deliberately crashed into buildings.

The idea of carrying out a similar attack using a commercial airliner eventually became central to his thinking. According to his confession, that ambition influenced his decision to pursue a career as a pilot.

 
  • Wow
Reactions: ABB
This type of things will only get worse using AI in my opinion

France: Hackers raised temperature of refrigerators in major food chains, causing fires

Hackers raised the temperature of numerous refrigerators in supermarkets in France to 50 degrees Celsius overnight, causing fires and food loss in hundreds of stores across the country as part of a widespread cyberattack. The Paris prosecutor's office said major food chains across the country were affected, and Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu ordered an investigation into the incident. The Carrefour food chain said 80 of its 6,000 stores in the country were affected.
 
At least not poison

US: Execution of Palestinian-Origin Terrorist Nidal Hasan to Be Livestreamed

The Pentagon announced that the execution by firing squad of Palestinian-origin terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan, who carried out a shooting spree at Fort Hood base in Texas, will be livestreamed. This comes after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated yesterday that the execution will take place on December 3, saying that "we will make sure people can watch this, and that the event will be public." Hasan, a psychiatrist who served in the U.S. Army, went on a killing spree in 2009 in which he shot and killed 13 people at Fort Hood base in Texas.

Agreed that 'livestreaming' it is a terrible idea, for many of the reasons already stated.

I also don't understand how it took 17 years to get to this point. Dude openly confessed during his trial in 2012 that he did it and that it was done to protect Taliban forces (i.e. he knew what he was doing, not some 'insanity' play).

I'm fine with lengthy appeals processes when someone is professing that they are innocent, or, there is a small chance the wrong person is in custody.

This one though? Dude did it, admitted to it and there were dozens of other witnesses who also reaffirm it.

Ridiculous that it took 17 years to get to the 'punishment' phase in a case like that.
 
Agreed that 'livestreaming' it is a terrible idea, for many of the reasons already stated.

I also don't understand how it took 17 years to get to this point. Dude openly confessed during his trial in 2012 that he did it and that it was done to protect Taliban forces (i.e. he knew what he was doing, not some 'insanity' play).

I'm fine with lengthy appeals processes when someone is professing that they are innocent, or, there is a small chance the wrong person is in custody.

This one though? Dude did it, admitted to it and there were dozens of other witnesses who also reaffirm it.

Ridiculous that it took 17 years to get to the 'punishment' phase in a case like that.
I was really surprised as well. I had forgotten about him and would have assumed he was doing life in ADX or was dead already. And that is one of my biggest problems with this announcement: most of the world had forgotten him and he is now notorious again.

I still stand by that life in ADX is not only a worse punishment (far worse, IMO), but would also not be as inspiring to the Jihadi crowd.
 
I was really surprised as well. I had forgotten about him and would have assumed he was doing life in ADX or was dead already. And that is one of my biggest problems with this announcement: most of the world had forgotten him and he is now notorious again.

I still stand by that life in ADX is not only a worse punishment (far worse, IMO), but would also not be as inspiring to the Jihadi crowd.

I mean there's two schools of thought on that.

One is, "why should this asshole get to live, when he admittedly took 13 others lives"

The other is, "why should we put this guy out of his misery, he should have to spend every day imprisoned and thinking about the lives he took and the consequences of his actions"


I honestly don't really get too caught up in all of that. I could argue either side and I wouldn't try to tell you that you're wrong and that death is worse than life in a supermax.

For me, it's more about being pragmatic re: death penalty... I just feel like if we're going to have a death penalty, we need to a bit more practical with it. If it's going to take nearly 20 years and cost a shit load of money and take hundreds of hours of peoples time to employ it on the most serious/indisputably guilty offenses possible, what's the point of having it at all?

And again, I'm not saying we should immediately execute everyone convicted of death penalty offenses... if there is a presumption of innocence or even a shred of a possibility that the courts might have got it wrong, by all means stretch it out until we're 100% sure.

This one is just such a slam dunk with literally no one questioning if the right person is being punished... what are we doing here?
 
Last edited:
The other is, "why should we put this guy out of his misery, he should have to spend every day imprisoned and thinking about the lives he took and the consequences of his actions"
I would understand that if it were regular prison, where one can have some kind of life if tough and crafty enough. ADX Florence is different. That is pure torture. Look at this picture of Robert Hanssen after decades of life alone in that box:

ah87lzhc08x41.jpg


That is the look of a completely broken person who knows nothing but loneliness, despair, and sorrow.

If you don't know the details of what life is like in ADX, I suggest you look into it. That place really shouldn't exist, to be honest. Anyone bad enough to be in there should probably just be put down. I'd rather take death ten times over than do life in that hellhole.


I honestly don't really get too caught up in all of that. I could argue either side and I wouldn't tell you that life in a supermax isn't worse than death (in some ways I'm sure it is).
See above. I can't see how you can argue life in there is better if you know the details of life in there. And what happens to people when they lose their mind in that box. Nightmarish stuff.


For me, it's more about being pragmatic re: death peanlty... I just feel like if we're going to have a death penalty, we need to a bit more practical with it. If it's going to take nearly 20 years and cost a shit load of money and take hundreds of hours of peoples time to employ it on the most serious/indisputably guilty offenses possible, what's the point of having it at all?
Agreed. In my opinion, we should use death less often, but be far more efficient in carrying it out. Due to it not being terribly hard to convict an innocent person, I do strongly feel that it should be reserved for cases where there is really no doubt, like Nidal, and the really heinous crimes like terrorism and serious crimes against children.
 
I would understand that if it were regular prison, where one can have some kind of life if tough and crafty enough. ADX Florence is different. That is pure torture. Look at this picture of Robert Hanssen after decades of life alone in that box:

ah87lzhc08x41.jpg


That is the look of a completely broken person who knows nothing but loneliness, despair, and sorrow.

If you don't know the details of what life is like in ADX, I suggest you look into it. That place really shouldn't exist, to be honest. Anyone bad enough to be in there should probably just be put down. I'd rather take death ten times over than do life in that hellhole.



See above. I can't see how you can argue life in there is better if you know the details of life in there. And what happens to people when they lose their mind in that box. Nightmarish stuff.

I don't disagree... and I do roll my eyes when people try to suggest that spending 40+ years in solitary (oftentimes being kept alive when you would gladly prefer death) is more humane than death by lethal injection.


Agreed. In my opinion, we should use death less often, but be far more efficient in carrying it out. Due to it not being terribly hard to convict an innocent person, I do strongly feel that it should be reserved for cases where there is really no doubt, like Nidal, and the really heinous crimes like terrorism and serious crimes against children.

100% agree.

I'm really not pro or anti death penalty... I just believe that the way it operates right now is completely broken. I'd be fine with keeping it as an option but amending it to make more sense/be more practical. I'd also be fine it didn't exist as an option (would save a ton of money and effort).

Pretty much either way is fine, as long as we adjust the way it works now... because what we got right now is ridiculous from a common sense/rationality standpoint
 
Back
Top