Round 6
This round we will be honoring the little guys in the sport of MMA. Guys who toil and risk injuries for a measly paycheck and little fanfare. Nominate your best fight between the two least recognizable fighters. No amateurs must be professional fighters. Use the write up to explain your choice, for ex. why does this fight stand out and etc.
1. @motives
Matt Horwich (red trunks) Vs Ryan McGivern (black trunks)
2006 IFL middle weight title fight.
In a better world, the International Fight League (IFL) might still be promoting fights today. Instead of pushing up daisies the last 2 decades with Bodog and Tachi Palace Fights.
Started by Chicago real estate mogul Kurt Otto and Wizard magazine founder Gareb Shamus in 2006. The IFL was the world's first mixed martial arts team league.
Shamus and Otto paid for MMA veterans like Renzo Gracie, Ken & Frank Shamrock, Bas Rutten, Pat Miletich, Don Frye and six other famous veteran fighters. To coach the IFL's 12 teams in a 2 division league. And on every Monday night right. After watching Jimmy Smith "
Fight Quest" the faces off of 15 Israeli Krav Maga instructors on The Discovery channel. You could switch over to FSN and watch 2 IFL teams from your neck of the woods face off. Each team had five fighters from lightweight to heavyweight. And whichever team won the best out of five fights won the team match that week. It was a fun concept that included playoffs and championships.
A league that gave us future UFC Stars Ben Rothwell and Roy Nelson. along with other eventual UFC veterans, Tim Kennedy and Jay Heiron. But investors were hard to come by in 2008. And due to financial issues the IFL closed its doors after only two seasons.
While the IFL's focus was on their team format. They also put on individual championship matches. One of which i'll be using as my submission today. In the clip below,
Portland Wolfpack middleweight and IFL champion
Matt Horwich defends his title against
Quad City Silverbacks Middleweight Ryan McGivern. Who's replacing
Chicago Red Bear middleweight Tim Kennedy as Kennedy steps away to fulfill some late 2006 military obligations. Leaving Ryan McGivern a late notice underdog shot at Horwich's 185lb IFL title.
A student of Pat Militich and a former Division 1A wrestler at the University of Iowa. McGivern was more than up for the challenge. But he would have to implement his extensive wrestling experience to negate Horwich's impressive grappling pedigree. Because as a pupil of both Royce Gracie and Eddie Bravo. Horwich's submission skills were a serious threat. Neither man was going to make it an easy night. And as the five round fight unfolded that became evident. Both men had to escape numerous submission attempts. And withstand some surprisingly heavy handed striking exchanges. Momentum would shift multiple times throughout. With both fighters setting a rigorous pace. and refusing all quarter.
*note* Going off of disclosed fighter payouts from the IFL Both Horowich and McGivern only took home about $8000 each for their championship fight. With under 4000 fans in attendance.
Matt Horwich (Red) VS Ryan McGivern (Black) IFL title fight
cmvideo75: Nice old school pull here. Never heard of the IFL before but I like the concept. Full score for 2 anonymous (to me) fighters. And the fight was excellent.... a good mix of striking and grappling and the grappling was pretty wild. That arm lock/sub attempt at the end of round 2 was crazy. Plus we get a young Mario Yamasaki in cargo pants. Nice submission.
Follow up - After watching all 8 fights this is the winner because it has the most variety in any of the fights. About 50/50 grappling and striking from both guys, crazy sub attempts, reversals.. And a real deep pull here too.10/10
Webble: I have heard of Matt Horwich but couldnt pick him out of a line up so I will let it slide. The write up took a bit of reading as it was a bit all over the place. This wasnt easy to watch as the video quality wasnt great but the fight itself was a good back and forth, I was surprised how little damage there was vs action taking place 7/10
osubuckeye4: Both fighters certainly fit the bill for the category. I had to pause for a minute on Horwich because I swear I remember his name popping up on undercards back in the day (remember I stopped watching MMA around 2012... but religiously watched throughout the 2000s). Looks like he fought a few times in the UFC (both losses) and Bellator (also losses), but when you have over 50 professional fights and under $20,000 in 'disclosed' payouts, you're definitely eligible for this category. No deduction for the fighters selected.
As far as the fight, man that first round was solid. 2nd was a bit of a lull, first 3 minutes were not very entertaining to watch. Last minute was entertaining and saved the round. As for the 3rd, some good exchanges but a lot of time spent in the clinch. Definitely agree that it's either fighters fight to win at this point, which is always the mark of a good scrap. 4th was a fun round, McGivern looked to take control though. It also looked like the entire fight was going to grind to a half at the 3 minute mark but I liked that he ref stood them up rather quickly and gave us an exciting last 20 seconds. 5th was a solid round, decisively McGiverns but credit to the official for separately the early clinch that was going nowhere.
All in all it was a solid, not spectacular, submission as a fight... but before I give the score I do have a gripe with your write-up. You say this was a 2006 fight, but the 2006 matchup between these two was a completely different fight (the announcer even mentions that fight was 90% on the ground and a snoozefest), this was the 2008 rematch. I was going to give you the benefit of the doubt on it being a typo, but in your write-up you double down and mention Tim Kennedy leaving to fulfill military obligations in 2006. Also, the IFL didn't even have individual championships until 2007, so the first matchup between the two in 2006 wasn't for a title. It's not a DQ for getting the wrong year, but when you're trying to sell us it does take away from the pitch when you didn't even take the time to verify that the fight you were referencing was the video you were providing. Score: 7/10 (was an 7.5/10 fight but I'm docking you -0.5 for not knowing the year your fight took place in)
GoodCat: I was in my sicko stage back in the mid 2000s. I was obsessed with any MMA I could find. I watched IFL when it started on FSN and then when this fight happened on HD Net Fights. I remember both of these guys, but can't say I specifically remember this fight, but I'm sure I watched it when it aired. I will say, the write up helped a bit in this case, cause this was a slog trying to get through the whole fight. Not because it wasn't a good fight, it was for sure. But there's just something about not watching something that you know isn't live and you can see how long it is. It just makes it harder to get through. Overall, good pick though. But not amazing. 7/10
Total: 31
2. @Eranys
Natan Schulte vs. Loik Radzhabov (PFL 10 – December 31, 2019)
The Fighters: Natan Schulte & Loik Radzhabov
The Stakes: $1,000,000 PFL Lightweight World Championship Final
Why This Fight Stands Out
Most fights between obscure, non UFC fighters take place in empty regional venues for small purses. Schulte vs. Radzhabov is the rare, incredible exception: two fighters relatively unknown outside of their regional fans went to war over $1,000,000. What followed was 25 minutes of absolute, technically sound, sustained violence, widely considered by hardcore analysts as one of the greatest lightweight wars in non UFC history.
From the opening bell, neither man took a single step backward. Radzhabov, a powerful, explosive striker from Tajikistan, came out firing absolute thunder, landing brutal power hooks and heavy leg kicks that would have knocked out almost anyone else in the division. But Schulte, a calm, methodical durability machine, absorbed the onslaught, marched directly through the shots, and forced a grueling, high volume brawl in the pocket.
For five intense rounds, the fight swung back and forth through rapid wrestling scrambles, brutal clinch work, and heavy exchanges where both men threw with bad intentions. There was no stalling, no point fighting, and no passive control time. Just two world class, under the radar combatants leaving everything in the cage to win the grand prize.
Schulte ultimately earned a razor thin decision victory to claim the belt and the million dollar check, leaving both men battered, exhausted, and covered in the battle damage of a 5 round war. It is the ultimate nomination because it proves that a bout doesn't necessarily need UFC branding or mainstream fame to be an absolute masterpiece of modern combat sports.
I didn't see a highlights only video, so apologies for the length, but it is totally worth the watch if you love really good, complete MMA. The fight lasts from 6:45 until 34:22, but you can obviously skip some in between stuff.
cmvideo75: Not a bad fight. Not a great fight either. Good striking but no one really got hurt. Schulte's chin was impressive in rd 2 but then Radz gassed in rd 3 and had his leg chopped up. It was a good striking battle but got a little one sided in the 2nd half. Plus I want to see some real damage and near finishes... I don't think we got too close to one here. Decent anonymous fighter selection though... this was fairly recent and I may have even watched this live but I don't remember these guys at all and haven't seen them since. But this was the title fight and back when they were going hard on the promotion for PFL so they aren't quite as anonymous as some of the others entered. Middle of the road entry IMO. 7/10
Webble: I hadnt heard of these two and feel like I should have given its PFL so well done for picking this. Well written write up and nice to see a female ring announcer, she was pretty good. The fight was fast paced and I cared who won, it was worth the watch although again I was surprised at lack of damage 8/10
osubuckeye4: I'm very conflicted on this one. The criteria specifically mentions 'measly paychecks'... but the bout was for $1,000,000 (insert Dr. Evil meme) and while Piffle isn't the UFC, it's definitely a known commodity for fight fans. This was a solid fight, but I think you're stretching the definition of 'unknown' to the limit by including a 2 time PFL champ who has over $1.2 mil in publicly disclosed winnings (that's more than a lot of current UFC guys).
All of that said, it was a great first 3 rounds. 1st was back and forth, both fighters had their moments. Radzhabov looked like he was going to put Schulte away in the 2nd, but might have overextended himself a bit. Schulte finally seized momentum in the 3rd, pressed the pace and started using the leg kicks. 4th and 5th though? They were just ehhhhh... I felt that Schulte was in the drivers seat at that point and cruised when he could have finished.
Another semantics gripe, you say 'razor thin decision'. How is a unanimous decision with one judge giving it a 49-44 razor thin? Okay, I'll pump the breaks and agree that the judge who scored it 49-44 is an idiot. I don't know that I'd say razor thin though. 49-46 felt right. I disagree with the judge who had it 48-47, but I disagree with judges often.
Any who, rounds 1-3 were very enjoyable. I think it would have been more appealing if Schulte had finished in the 4th rather than watching Radzhabov barely be able to stand/mount anything for the last 7-8 minutes.
Score: 5/10 (It's a 8/10 fight but you get -3 for it being a fight that literally paid out $1,000,000 to the winner. Come on man.)
GoodCat: . I like this pick better than the first one. Firstly, much less recognizable guys, and also just a better fight. Neither guy backing up, both moving forward and exchanging at all times. Very evenly matched fight, it probably goes 5-5 if they fought 10 times. 8/10
Total: 28
3. @Tito Orcheese
CFFC 129: Bilal Hasan vs Jacob Romano | February 9, 2024
When you think "exciting fight" in regards to MMA, one might tend to lean towards a back-and-forth between two evenly matched opponents, but a fight that is more of a one-sided beating can leave me with a nice chub just as well. Pro tip: you know you're watching a good one when the commentary team keeps going on about how "tough" or "durable" a fighter is.
Here we have a classic striker-vs-grappler match-up. Hasan hits "Sweet Baby" Ray Romano with a sneaky elbow early, opening up a nasty cut that has them both looking like murder victims within seconds. Nothing quite adds that extra layer to a fight like someone bleeding profusely all over the place.
*insert justbleedguy.gif*
Anyway, the rest of the round has the "tough" guy continuing to move forward, securing some takedowns, and getting pieced up for his efforts. Hasan kills this guy on the feet, landing any technique he feels like throwing, and makes him pay for most of the takedowns and attempts with a heavy dosage of elbows. That's a quality round; let's hope for more of that in the second!
Alright, "Baby" Ray is strong out the gate for the 2nd; he sure is "tough"! Maybe he can mount a comeba...
Oh....
Well, there you have it: a blood-soaked striking clinic ending with a spinning wheel kick for the knockout. I'll take it!
I've never heard of either of these guys, and I'm pretty sure Romano took home a cool $1,500 for that concussion. Hopefully you judges enjoyed the fight while appreciating the fact that I didn't make you sit through a 5 rounder....
cmvideo75: First off, thanks for not making me watch another 25 minute fight lol. This was the most entertaining one so far. Not sure it was the 'best' fight given how thoroughly one guy got beat. That finish was brutal. But the write up argues for a different definition of a 'great fight' which includes blood and violence and a vicious finish and I like the argument. I might consider it more of an entertaining fight than a truly great fight though. But I enjoyed this one the most so far and 2 more anonymous fighters to me. That Hasan guy has some razor elbows.
Follow up - This one bumps up a notch with me just because it was a different take on a 'great fight' from all the other entries and this was definitely one of the most entertaining ones. 8/10
Webble: I hadnt heard of either of these two and it was good hearing John Morgan on commentary. For a flyweight bout this was fire, lots of back and forth, damage and oh shit moments, I liked it 10/10
osubuckeye4: I've never heard of the CFFC, let alone either of these fighters, so no risk of me knocking it on that those grounds. I have to add that I love the overreactionary nature of these commentators (comparing Romano to Rory McDonald... Hasan is Edson Barbosa, lol good times)
Damn, those little guys have sharp elbows... that was a gusher from what didn't look like a whole lot in real time. Solid first round, not spectacular but definitely had some fun moments and while Hasan controlled it for the most part you gotta admire Romano's grit/tenacity. I will say that without the gushing blood from Romano this is a 'eh, that was ok' round. With it though, elevates it and adds to the stakes.
No gripes on the write-up, accurately described/billed. The only knock on this one is that Hasan really dominated that fight outside of the early takedown that Romano did nothing with. I was expecting for Romano to be the one to land the "out of nowhere!" finish... that would have been an oh shit! Hasan hitting it was more of, "yes, that was expected given the prior 6-7 minutes leading up to it". I did enjoy watching it though, and there's no way in a million years I ever would have stumbled onto it outside of this format, which is definitely the spirit of this round. Also 1,000 thank you's for not submitting a 5 round title fight that took me 30 minutes to get thru. Score: 7.5/10
GoodCat: Eh, this one kinda misses the mark for me. I know in your write up you tried to explain your side of the excitement
aspect of it. And I do agree that it was exciting, but the category does state "best" fight and not most exciting. And like you even mentioned in the write up, this was a one sided beatdown the entire time. Props to Romano for not quitting even while getting battered on the feet. But he never really had a chance in this one. 5/10
Total: 30.5