UFC 93 thoughts and lines

Originally posted by: Brick
Date: January 14, 2009 at 09:24 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

I'm thinking I like Marcus Davis at -145. I thought he would take Swick, but Swick is looking like a force again so the loss doesn't seem so bad. Other than this fight, his record and performances have been outstanding. But then, Lytle's last three losses have been to studs -- Alves, Koscheck, and Hughes -- and he is nearly impossible to finish. But I think Davis is undervalued here.
 
Originally posted by: osubuckeye4
Date: January 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Sockbat said:
are you kidding me?
My play of the year is Rousimar Palhares @ -315 over Jeremy Horn.
I've studied Mr Palhares extensively before he fought Henderson. and there is no way in hell i see Horn winning 25% of the time. I have him at 10% AT MOST. which would put value in Palhares for me at up to -1000. -315 is absolute thievery.
just at a quick glance.
1. Horn will not KO Palhares. Henderson landed several clean powershots to his face and couldn't do it. Horn is several notches below Danny in that department. Not going to happen.
2. Palhares will manhandle him much like Nate did. Palhares is much stronger and faster then Horn. Horn cannot summit Palhares. Not going to happen.
sure, Horn is a slick old-timer with over 100 fights and 80 wins, but Palhares is on another level of talent and is athletically superior in every aspect.
when i first saw this matchup was going to happen, i thought Horn was being put in this match to be the sacrificial lamb. he was the perfect matchup for Palhares
the only way i can see Horn winning is if he uses his height to outbox Palhares for 3 rounds. but i just don't see that happening. i think Palhares will score the TD and sub him in the first round.
i'm betting the farm on this one. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...
I could also see Horn winning by flash KO or freak injury to Palhares... but that's possible in every fight.
Aside from that though, I agree with everything said here.
Then again, I think the betting public does as well, because the line has shot up to -350 right now. Actually over at SportsInt. it's at -455 (which is where I figured it would open at, right around -475 to -500... was shocked to see it below -350)
 
Originally posted by: EnderWiggin
Date: January 14, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

I think Belcher is a good play down to about -190.
I think Belcher will be able to keep the fight on the feet for the most part, where Kang's advantage isn't that large.
Add in the facts that this is Kang's octogan debut, and many of those who's reputation was built fighting primarily in Japan have failed to impress in the UFC, and you've got Belcher looking like a decent threat to pull the upset.
 
Originally posted by: Sockbat
Date: January 15, 2009 at 12:24 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

osubuckeye4 said:
Sockbat said:
are you kidding me?
My play of the year is Rousimar Palhares @ -315 over Jeremy Horn.
I've studied Mr Palhares extensively before he fought Henderson. and there is no way in hell i see Horn winning 25% of the time. I have him at 10% AT MOST. which would put value in Palhares for me at up to -1000. -315 is absolute thievery.
just at a quick glance.
1. Horn will not KO Palhares. Henderson landed several clean powershots to his face and couldn't do it. Horn is several notches below Danny in that department. Not going to happen.
2. Palhares will manhandle him much like Nate did. Palhares is much stronger and faster then Horn. Horn cannot summit Palhares. Not going to happen.
sure, Horn is a slick old-timer with over 100 fights and 80 wins, but Palhares is on another level of talent and is athletically superior in every aspect.
when i first saw this matchup was going to happen, i thought Horn was being put in this match to be the sacrificial lamb. he was the perfect matchup for Palhares
the only way i can see Horn winning is if he uses his height to outbox Palhares for 3 rounds. but i just don't see that happening. i think Palhares will score the TD and sub him in the first round.
i'm betting the farm on this one. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...
I could also see Horn winning by flash KO or freak injury to Palhares... but that's possible in every fight.
Aside from that though, I agree with everything said here.
Then again, I think the betting public does as well, because the line has shot up to -350 right now. Actually over at SportsInt. it's at -455 (which is where I figured it would open at, right around -475 to -500... was shocked to see it below -350)
Click to expand...
I was shocked to see it at -315. i was expecting it at around -500 too.
think back to UFC88. Dan Henderson got to around -170 vs Palhares. that's 63% for Danny. and a damn good chance for a new kid like Palhares.
this is MMA and styles make matchups. Dan is a world-class striker and wrestler. and if you strike and wrestle better then your opponent, you can beat the best BJJ wizard on earth everytime. you can't work too many subs when you're both on your feet. Dan's gameplan was to win. so he did everything in his power to keep it on his feet. great job for the win...
Palhares trains with Brazilian Top Team, one of the best teams in the world. There are stories of him subbing some of his much bigger teammates with ease. Something i could never see Horn doing. I repect Horn. I like him a lot as a fighter and i've watched him for a long time. And he has a hell of a lot of wins vs world-class fighters (forrest, yvel, loiseau, lister, etc...) but i haven't seen much improvement in his game in many years. Fighters these days are so much better overall then they where 5 years ago..
let's go for Horn. how can he win...
submission. horn is an excellent grappler. but i think Palhares is in other class. stories aside, there are still unknowns about Palhares but anybody could get caught if they're in the wrong position. Palhares could have a brain-lapse and Horn slips him the armbar. you never know. i say around 5%.
flash KO. it could happen. but just based on his last fight, Palhares could take one hell of a punch. Dan landed flush few times and it just looked like he only went down because he wanted to get Dan there. Horn has half Danny's KO power. Horn could land him flush on the jaw and drop him, then gnp... but that's not much Horns game... i'll say 5%.
decision. maybe he dances around the ring all day and jabs his way to the W. it can happen but i think Palhares is too fast and strong to not take it to the mat at sometime. if it goes to decision, whoever wrestled better wins... 3%
there's always injury/cut. not sure of the odds. but i'll say it happens in around 1 in 20 matches. divide that by 2 (it could happen to horn too). that's 2%.
Palhares good at 80-85% = value up to -500 IMO :mrgreen:
 
Originally posted by: Performify
Date: January 15, 2009 at 06:58 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

early writeup preview for the loyal forum junkies:
[admin]http://mmajunkie.com/news/13720/performifys-picks-for-ufc-93.mma[/admin]
-P
 
Originally posted by: Brick
Date: January 15, 2009 at 08:04 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Performify said:
early writeup preview for the loyal forum junkies:
[admin]http://mmajunkie.com/news/13720/performifys-picks-for-ufc-93.mma[/admin]
-P
Click to expand...
Good stuff so far; haven't read it all yet, but wanted to point out a little typo before you post in on the main site. You state Hendo is 44 years old, but I believe he is only 38 (you've written too many articles on Couture, lol).
edit: Just finished the article. I turned in my picks yesterday, and we have every winner picked the same down the line. A few differences regarding round/method. Most notable is your bold pick that Davis will be able to finish Lytle; I'm so impressed with Lytle's record of durability that I wasn't able to go there so I went with Davis by decision. Although your point on stoppage by cut is a good one; Lytle lost enough blood to fill a swimming pool in that fight against Koscheck, and a more cautious ref may have stopped it.
I also had Kampmann winning by submission as opposed to your TKO; that seems to be Kampman's trend lately, as five of his last seven wins have been by submission. Barros does not seem particularly susceptible to either, so I went with submission, figuring even if Kampmann's striking and GnP do the job it could result in a RNC, which is almost always set up by strikes.
Lastly, I do have Kang finishing Belcher, 2nd rd KO, I don't think it will go the distance. Kang does not tend to let things go to a decision, and Belcher has shown the ability to be finished early (Day, 1st rd.). If Day can pull it off, I think Kang can too. ("kang can too"...sounds like something on a Chinese take-out menu).
Like I said, very few and small differences in our picks, which has me feeling pretty good about my picks. Thanks as always for the advanced peek.
 
Originally posted by: EnderWiggin
Date: January 15, 2009 at 08:22 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Performify said:
early writeup preview for the loyal forum junkies:
[admin]http://mmajunkie.com/news/13720/performifys-picks-for-ufc-93.mma[/admin]
-P
Click to expand...
Great breakdowns as always. Appreciate it.
Small typo alert before you go to press. You were thinking about Coleman when you listed Henderson's age:
Henderson is 44 years old and ...
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by: Phenom
Date: January 15, 2009 at 08:32 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Hey P just so you know you have Henderson listed at age 44 in the article.
 
Originally posted by: EnderWiggin
Date: January 15, 2009 at 08:59 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Did I mention that Henderson is only 38?
 
Originally posted by: osubuckeye4
Date: January 15, 2009 at 11:26 AM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Wow P, you're puttin a lot of units down on this event.
I have my bets locked in, I'll post them after the JFC weigh in's are up.
 
Originally posted by: Performify
Date: January 15, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Thanks for the correction on Henderson's age.
 
Originally posted by: Stevie_G
Date: January 16, 2009 at 01:50 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

I really like Paul Harris, even at those crappy odds.
 
Originally posted by: Performify
Date: January 16, 2009 at 02:01 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Coleman looked terrible at weighins.
Shots off the cameraphone while we're waiting for an official gallery:
-P
 
Originally posted by: Brick
Date: January 16, 2009 at 02:09 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Performify said:
Coleman looked terrible at weighins.
Click to expand...
Wow. I think the word "gaunt" jumps into my mind first.
Arianny, on the other hand, looks as fabulous as always. What genius even thought to invent shorts that small? Nice framing, P.
 
Originally posted by: Tai_Mai_Shu
Date: January 16, 2009 at 04:06 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Brick said:
Performify said:
Coleman looked terrible at weighins.
Click to expand...
Wow. I think the word "gaunt" jumps into my mind first.
Arianny, on the other hand, looks as fabulous as always. What genius even thought to invent shorts that small? Nice framing, P.
Click to expand...
I thought I saw the new octogan girl on the left side of screen? Trying to remember her name...
 
Originally posted by: EnderWiggin
Date: January 16, 2009 at 05:24 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Brick said:
Performify said:
Coleman looked terrible at weighins.
Click to expand...
Wow. I think the word "gaunt" jumps into my mind first.
Arianny, on the other hand, looks as fabulous as always. What genius even thought to invent shorts that small? Nice framing, P.
Click to expand...
The words depressed and slow jumped to my mind.
 
Originally posted by: Norm
Date: January 16, 2009 at 05:30 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

EnderWiggin said:
Brick said:
Performify said:
Coleman looked terrible at weighins.
Click to expand...
Wow. I think the word "gaunt" jumps into my mind first.
Arianny, on the other hand, looks as fabulous as always. What genius even thought to invent shorts that small? Nice framing, P.
Click to expand...
The words depressed and slow jumped to my mind.
Click to expand...
I don't think he looks that bad. Perhaps it's just a bit shocking to see a version of Coleman that is/looks 40lbs smaller than he normally weighs? IMO, the cut was a non factor for him, he's been cutting weight for probably 30+ years.
I am staying the hell away from this fight, but have a weird gut feeling that coleman pulls this one off. Funny how not wagering any money will make you feel that way.
 
Originally posted by: Jak
Date: January 16, 2009 at 06:49 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

I put $50 on Alexandre Barros @ +400. i don't have a clue anything about him, but i like betting against the unanimous favorite. it's done me good in recent fights, and while i don't necessarily believe Barros will take this fight(i also don't mind losing a small amount on a long shot), i believe there is enough to think that Kampmann has a decent percentage chance losing as well.
Only bet i'm taking on this card.
 
Originally posted by: Norm
Date: January 16, 2009 at 06:53 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-93-thoughts-and-lines.8994/

Jak said:
I put $50 on Alexandre Barros @ +400. i don't have a clue anything about him, but i like betting against the unanimous favorite. it's done me good in recent fights, and while i don't necessarily believe Barros will take this fight(i also don't mind losing a small amount on a long shot), i believe there is enough to think that Kampmann has a decent percentage chance losing as well.
Only bet i'm taking on this card.
Click to expand...
Strange post. You would have been better off taking a coleman, a horn, or a belcher. not necessarily based off their chances of winning, but off the info you'd be able to use to complete some research. good luck to you thought!
 
Back
Top