Originally posted by: brian04280
Date: April 25, 2014 at 12:13 PM
Source: https://forum.mmajunkie.com/threads/ufc-is-not-a-sport.62010/
BUDO-MMA-NYC said:
I'm listening to Junkie radio right now and Jeremy Botter is co-hosting. For those that don't know, Jeremy is a respected MMA journalist who is widely considered a deep insider in the MMA industry.
When discussing the topic of Gina Carano coming back and getting an immediate title shot, he said a few interesting things.
-The "hardcores" are responsible for 160-210,000 PPV buys for every UFC PPV.
-There's a 70% chance Ronda vs Gina will happen in December.
-If it does happen he thinks it will do 1M buys.
-That fight is ridiculous to people who know the UFC, but works for those who don't follow as seriously.
That was all interesting but the biggest thing he said was, and this is as close to verbatim as I can recall, "Let's be honest, the UFC is NOT a sport, it's an entertainment organization. Every decision Zuffa makes is based on entertainment and finances first, they just revolve around the concept of being a sport."
That's a very heavy statement, how do you feel about it?
Click to expand...
I think it is a textbook logical fallacy, namely the False Dilemma or False Dichotomy fallacy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
As such, I reject it out of hand.
Is the UFC an entertainment organization? Yep. Is every professional sports league on the planet an entertainment organization? Yes. Well maybe it's better said that they are an entertainment business or a failing business.
Being an entertainment organization does not in any way shape or form proclude the UFC from promoting a sport. (I guess Botter's technical correct that the UFC is not a sport, but rather a business that promotes a sport, but I am willing to be charitable and assume it was sloppy language on Botter's part.)
So, apart from being an entertainment organization, does the UFC actively promote sport? Dictionary.com defines sport as:
an athletic activity requiring skill or physical prowess and often of a competitive
nature
, as racing,
baseball,
tennis, golf, bowling, wrestling, boxing, hunting, fishing, etc.
Certainly anyone who has ever watched a fight in the UFC would agree that it is an athletic activity, that it requires skill and physical prowess, and is competitive in nature.
So yes, the UFC actively promotes a sport.
Ergo, Botter is wrong in his logical fallacy.