WAR

Does every resident of Alaska still get an oil subsidy check every year? If so, why don't they just reduce that?
The PFD, yes. That is a very complex and thorny issue. Reducing it requires the full cooperation of different parts of government, and is wildly politically unpopular. The truth is that the state can't really afford the PFD anymore but it is political suicide to vote to repeal it. So the amount has been going down slowly. It will probably be about $1200-$1400 per person this year. Not sure yet. On the bright side for me, I get 4 of them every year now since we had another child last year.
 
Absolutely atrocious handling of the conflict. I was against it initially, but if we were going to do this, it needed to be fast, efficient, and ruthless. We should have started taking islands and coastal territory until they cried for mercy. Instead, we have a real estate negotiator thinking he can talk his way into victory.

All the more reason to believe that this was not an operation planned by anyone with a functioning cranium.

I cannot wait for the downfall of Maga. The books that will be written on how to destroy two generations of "conservative" politics in 18 months will be epic.
 

How a kamikaze drone that is just ‘good enough’ is changing warfare​

Artist's impression of Shahed 136 drones striking airport






Sometimes, a good-enough option beats the best tech and the highest budget – and the Shahed 136 is a perfect example of a good-enough option. Iran’s cheap kamikaze drone is changing the face of warfare and creating the potential for airborne munitions on a cash-strapped budget.


Its use by Russia – in the form of Geran-2 – in the war in Ukraine, and by Iranian forces across the Middle East has proven that the Shahed 136 will undoubtedly change the nature of warfare by just being good enough.


The Shahed 136 is an Iranian kamikaze drone often called the “moped of the sky” due to the look and placement of its single engine.


It is a remarkably simple weapon often labeled as a drone, but it falls into the category of loitering munitions.


Loitering munitions are airborne munitions that deploy as a kamikaze-style attack vessel. Their strength is their relative low cost, simplicity, ease of deployment, and effectiveness.


The Shahed 136 is about 11.5 feet long and capable of deploying a warhead of over 100 pounds. It has an estimated effective range of 600 to 1,600 miles. It relies on a combination of Inertial Navigation and civilian GPS to strike its target and has been found to include SIM cards for advanced navigation.


With an estimated cost of between $20,000 and 80,000 to produce, it’s creating a significant problem for even the most advanced military forces, because missiles designed to intercept the Shahed cost between $100,000 and three million.


Aside from the cost, these loitering munitions can be produced extremely quickly, whereas interceptor missiles take more time and effort to produce resulting in an economic mismatch of production.

Shahed drone downed in Ukraine
A Geran-2 drone, as the Shahed-136 is designated by Russia, downed in the Sumy region of Ukraine. Explosive experts removed the warhead for disposal, October 2024. (National Police of Ukraine)
Thousands of Geran-2s have been deployed throughout Ukraine. Not only are they causing massive casualties, but also deplete expensive counter-munitions forcing Ukraine to device low-cost solutions to counter them.


Meanwhile, the Houthis have used the Shahed to target trade vessels. A drone that costs at most $80,000 can bring billions of dollars of global trade to a halt with clever use. The Houthis also used Shaheds to target Saudi oil facilities, causing massive damage to oil supplies.


Across the Middle East, the Shahed has become a common threat used to terrorize population centers, military bases, and other installations.


Shaheds often are deployed en masse to increase the likelihood that one will make it through air defenses and hit its target. Even if only a few make it through, their damage potential is significant. Quantity becomes a quality of its own.


Launching the Shahed isn’t difficult and doesn’t require a concrete runway or a complicated launching system. Instead, launch racks are used to deploy multiple Shaheds via a rocket assist. Once the rocket reaches a high-enough altitude, the drone’s engine kicks on and carries the Shahed to its final target.


These units are capable enough that the U.S. took notice and began producing its own low-cost alternative known as the Low-Cost Unmanned Combat Attack System, or LUCAS.


Related: New frontiers in anti-drone munitions were on display at SHOT Show 2026

RAV-4 anti-drone weapon system.
U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Dommonic Fenton, a cavalry scout assigned to Eagle Troop, 2d Squadron, 2d Cavalry Regiment, inspects the RAV-4 anti-drone weapon system in preparation for Project Flytrap at Pabradė Training Area, Lithuania, May 3, 2026. FlyTrap is a counter-unmanned aerial system exercise designed to integrate emerging technologies and inform future Army requirements and doctrine. (U.S. Army Reserve photo by Sgt. Joseph Honce)
A weakness of the Shahed is its relative slow speed: it flies at only around 115 miles per hour making it vulnerable. Iran recognized that and started producing a faster version known as the Shahed 238. (Russia is also using its own version of the 238, known as the Geran-3, in the war in Ukraine.)


Due to its low speed, the Shahed 136, itself, can be countered with machine gun fire; it also caused the resurgence of flak-cannon-style ground-to-air defenses. Sometimes simple can beat simple.


Airpower is no longer exclusively the domain of well-equipped, well-funded military forces. Instead, it’s been democratized to be affordable, effective, and deadly.


While asymmetric economics remain in play, the jet-powered Shahed will have a place it warfare.


Weapons like the Shahed 136 are more than just basic attack drones – they are an effective economic and psychological tool that has created a ripple in modern warfare that might become a tsunami.
 
Absolutely atrocious handling of the conflict. I was against it initially, but if we were going to do this, it needed to be fast, efficient, and ruthless. We should have started taking islands and coastal territory until they cried for mercy. Instead, we have a real estate negotiator thinking he can talk his way into victory.
I've kept my opinions to myself for the most part. I didn't like it either but we jumped in (too late) and I support my country. I sense that we're getting played now. I agree with you, go in hot and heavy and gtfo. enough of these multi decade sand wars
 
The PFD, yes. That is a very complex and thorny issue. Reducing it requires the full cooperation of different parts of government, and is wildly politically unpopular. The truth is that the state can't really afford the PFD anymore but it is political suicide to vote to repeal it. So the amount has been going down slowly. It will probably be about $1200-$1400 per person this year. Not sure yet. On the bright side for me, I get 4 of them every year now since we had another child last year.
That's kinda cool, you're gonna get an extra $6,842 this year
 
I've kept my opinions to myself for the most part. I didn't like it either but we jumped in (too late) and I support my country. I sense that we're getting played now. I agree with you, go in hot and heavy and gtfo. enough of these multi decade sand wars

Operation hot and heavy, I like it.

1780022539732.jpeg
 
I've kept my opinions to myself for the most part. I didn't like it either but we jumped in (too late) and I support my country. I sense that we're getting played now. I agree with you, go in hot and heavy and gtfo. enough of these multi decade sand wars
It's been too long since we've had a competent former General as president. I was going to vote for Wesley Clark when he tried to run in '04.
 
It's been too long since we've had a competent former General as president. I was going to vote for Wesley Clark when he tried to run in '04.
No goal upon the outset, a developing No Nuclear goal as it unfolded, and now a deal on the table that opens the Straight with no tolls but kicks the Nuclear can down the road in the form of "talks".

TF are we doing?
 
No goal upon the outset, a developing No Nuclear goal as it unfolded, and now a deal on the table that opens the Straight with no tolls but kicks the Nuclear can down the road in the form of "talks".

TF are we doing?
That's what happens when you negotiate when your people "just want it to be over"
 
No goal upon the outset, a developing No Nuclear goal as it unfolded, and now a deal on the table that opens the Straight with no tolls but kicks the Nuclear can down the road in the form of "talks".

TF are we doing?
Trump made the same mistake we have made in the past: thinking we can bomb an enemy into surrender. That can work on the right opponent, but the Iranian regime is not one of those. Trump thought he could wow them with overwhelming air power and they would want to make a deal with him and he could walk away looking legendary. He's got the balls but not the brains to do big things.
 
Trump made the same mistake we have made in the past: thinking we can bomb an enemy into surrender. That can work on the right opponent, but the Iranian regime is not one of those. Trump thought he could wow them with overwhelming air power and they would want to make a deal with him and he could walk away looking legendary. He's got the balls but not the brains to do big things.
they hath survived, and that's all they had to do.
 
If they surrender to Trump, they might as well hang themselves from streetlights because that's what their people would do to them if they showed enough weakness. Trump has no understanding of his opponent and so he is destined to fail.
it didn't work. it went on for too long with no clear desired end game. now the opponent is gas prices and that touches all of us. fuck.
 

 
Back
Top