WAR

a-mart said:
How Israeli commandos hunted Hezbollah underground for 3 months before blowing up Ali Taher Ridge

Maglan and Yahalom commanders describe months of ambushes, close-range fighting and underground warfare before Israeli forces destroyed what the IDF called a strategic Hezbollah complex in southern Lebanon

www.ynetnews.com

How Israeli commandos hunted Hezbollah underground for 3 months before blowing up Ali Taher Ridge

Maglan and Yahalom commanders describe months of ambushes, close-range fighting and underground warfare before Israeli forces destroyed what the IDF called a strategic Hezbollah complex in southern Lebanon
www.ynetnews.com www.ynetnews.com


Bardem was right, it WAS us!

Israel, Morocco agree to upgrade ties, open embassies

Sa’ar and Moroccan counterpart meet in New York, agreeing to appoint ambassadors, expand direct flights and deepen economic ties

www.ynetnews.com

Israel, Morocco agree to upgrade ties, open embassies

Sa’ar and Moroccan counterpart meet in New York, agreeing to appoint ambassadors, expand direct flights and deepen economic ties
www.ynetnews.com www.ynetnews.com
Click to expand...
I don't trust any Arab nation aside from UAE (because they love money more than they hate Jews and are honest about it), but hopefully this actually results in something 2-3 generations down the road. I am fucking tired of having a quarter of the planet off-limits to me because of my last name.
 
ABB said:
Ass?
Click to expand...
ass-adman.gif
 
Funny how all their "errors" are always towards one specific side

New York Times Removes Sentence From Article: 'Israelis See Themselves as Victims of Oct. 7'

The New York Times apologized and removed a sentence from an article about the documentary 'Collateral Damage' (NAZA) following criticism that the text implied Israelis are not victims of the October 7 attack. The removed sentence stated that 'Israelis still largely see themselves as victims of October 7.' The newspaper's editors clarified that it was an 'editing error' and that the original text 'mistakenly implied that Israelis' experience as victims of terror is a matter of perception.' Israeli Embassy spokesperson in Washington Tal Naim wrote to the newspaper: 'What you published is simply an unmasked version of the attitude you have expressed toward the State of Israel over the past three years.'
 
a-mart said:
Funny how all their "errors" are always towards one specific side

New York Times Removes Sentence From Article: 'Israelis See Themselves as Victims of Oct. 7'

The New York Times apologized and removed a sentence from an article about the documentary 'Collateral Damage' (NAZA) following criticism that the text implied Israelis are not victims of the October 7 attack. The removed sentence stated that 'Israelis still largely see themselves as victims of October 7.' The newspaper's editors clarified that it was an 'editing error' and that the original text 'mistakenly implied that Israelis' experience as victims of terror is a matter of perception.' Israeli Embassy spokesperson in Washington Tal Naim wrote to the newspaper: 'What you published is simply an unmasked version of the attitude you have expressed toward the State of Israel over the past three years.'
Click to expand...

I mean, not really... but ok?

Corrections - The New York Times

They corrected 9 articles yesterday, 5 the day prior and 7 on Monday. A couple had to do with international affairs/war, but a lot were domestic issues.

Major publications that are churning out a lot of content on a daily basis make a lot of small errors.

They openly apologized and promptly corrected the error, I don't know what else you expect them to do?
 
osubuckeye4 said:
I mean, not really... but ok?

Corrections - The New York Times

They corrected 9 articles yesterday, 5 the day prior and 7 on Monday. A couple had to do with international affairs/war, but a lot were domestic issues.

Major publications that are churning out a lot of content on a daily basis make a lot of small errors.

They openly apologized and promptly corrected the error, I don't know what else you expect them to do?
Click to expand...
You clearly missed the point
 
a-mart said:
You clearly missed the point
Click to expand...

You missed the point where they had to correct TWENTY other non-Israel related articles in a 3 day span for editorial/grammatical/factual errors.

At least the Israelis get an apology... everyone else has to send their social media circle the link to the 'corrections' page and tell them to scroll to the bottom to see that the correction was made.

This isn't an Israel bias, it's a problem where editors are pawning more and more shit off to AI and not actually reviewing content before it gets posted.


Had people complained and the Times response been, "there is no need for correction, this was our intent" THAT would be a problem/bias.
 
osubuckeye4 said:
You missed the point where they had to correct TWENTY other non-Israel related articles in a 3 day span for editorial/grammatical/factual errors.

At least the Israelis get an apology... everyone else has to send their social media circle the link to the 'corrections' page and tell them to scroll to the bottom to see that the correction was made.

This isn't an Israel bias, it's a problem where editors are pawning more and more shit off to AI and not actually reviewing content before it gets posted.


Had people complained and the Times response been, "there is no need for correction, this was our intent" THAT would be a problem/bias.
Click to expand...
No. You missed the point.
 
Eranys said:
No. You missed the point.
Click to expand...

What is the point?

Man, when I played sports I'd get approached for quotes all the time and there were numerous times where the papers fucked up what I said.

One time they fucked it up so bad it was causing issues on our team so our AD reached out to the paper and asked wtf was going on. The paper said, "oops, we got your athletes quote mixed up with an athlete at another school, we'll issue a retraction"

Our coach had to print out the retraction and hand it to my teammates and have a team meeting to assure everyone I wasn't a complete asshole (just kind of an asshole)

It wasn't some reporter and editor with a bias against people with my ethnicity, the paper simply made a fuck-up... got called out on the fuck-up, corrected the fuck-up and issued a retraction.

It unfortunately happens all the time. Literally 20 other articles had to be corrected/retractions issues/spelling errors fixed/grammar adjusted. Vast majority had nothing to do with Israel
 
osubuckeye4 said:
What is the point?

Man, when I played sports I'd get approached for quotes all the time and there were numerous times where the papers fucked up what I said.

One time they fucked it up so bad it was causing issues on our team so our AD reached out to the paper and asked wtf was going on. The paper said, "oops, we got your athletes quote mixed up with an athlete at another school, we'll issue a retraction"

Our coach had to print out the retraction and hand it to my teammates and have a team meeting to assure everyone I wasn't a complete asshole (just kind of an asshole)

It wasn't some reporter and editor with a bias against people with my ethnicity, the paper simply made a fuck-up... got called out on the fuck-up, corrected the fuck-up and issued a retraction.

It unfortunately happens all the time. Literally 20 other articles had to be corrected/retractions issues/spelling errors fixed/grammar adjusted. Vast majority had nothing to do with Israel
Click to expand...
I fail to understand how someone as clearly intelligent as you are can blind themselves to obvious facts. The NYT has had a clear anti-Israel bias for quite some time. This clearly fit a pattern that has existed for many years. If you can't see that, you're either not paying attention, or you are willfully blinding yourself.
 
osubuckeye4 said:
What is the point?

Man, when I played sports I'd get approached for quotes all the time and there were numerous times where the papers fucked up what I said.

One time they fucked it up so bad it was causing issues on our team so our AD reached out to the paper and asked wtf was going on. The paper said, "oops, we got your athletes quote mixed up with an athlete at another school, we'll issue a retraction"

Our coach had to print out the retraction and hand it to my teammates and have a team meeting to assure everyone I wasn't a complete asshole (just kind of an asshole)

It wasn't some reporter and editor with a bias against people with my ethnicity, the paper simply made a fuck-up... got called out on the fuck-up, corrected the fuck-up and issued a retraction.

It unfortunately happens all the time. Literally 20 other articles had to be corrected/retractions issues/spelling errors fixed/grammar adjusted. Vast majority had nothing to do with Israel
Click to expand...
You must have played basketball
 
Eranys said:
I fail to understand how someone as clearly intelligent as you are can blind themselves to obvious facts. The NYT has had a clear anti-Israel bias for quite some time. This clearly fit a pattern that has existed for many years. If you can't see that, you're either not paying attention, or you are willfully blinding yourself.
Click to expand...
jooz = bad
 
Let me spell it out for you buckey

All of the middle east "errors" and "dogs trained to rape palestinians" articles and even "Iran killing a few hundreds of their own civilians" (ok maybe that was a BBC "error") are always "errors" biased against one side and not the other

I've shown here how these are not some innocent "mistakes" and how they've changed over the last 20 years especially their editorial side so I'm not gonna do that again

and wow I'm so glad they only to apologized to Israel!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Eranys said:
I fail to understand how someone as clearly intelligent as you are can blind themselves to obvious facts. The NYT has had a clear anti-Israel bias for quite some time. This clearly fit a pattern that has existed for many years. If you can't see that, you're either not paying attention, or you are willfully blinding yourself.
Click to expand...

I never said NYT didn't have an Israel bias

The original comment said, "all these errors are always towards one specific side"

That's not correct... NYT makes dozens of errors a week of the grammatical variety, the vast majority of which have nothing to do with Israel and which they don't issue a public apology for when called out.

Brick said:
jooz = bad
Click to expand...

I love how all of you would laugh and pile on BLM (along with me) for doing this nonsense 8-10 years ago

How is this any different?

I'm not suggesting that anti-Semitism is fake or that the NYT doesn't have a bias.

My point is that thinking THIS... a grammar error which they promptly issued a full public apology and immediate correction for (and made much larger headlines in the apology than the initial story received)... is crying wolf and just looking to get upset.
 
Last edited:
Burning tires, empty pumps: $100 oil sparks global unrest as Iran war drags on

From mass protests in Syria and fishermen blocking French fuel depots to shortages across Asia, governments face a growing choice between passing soaring energy costs to consumers or taking on more debt to shield them

www.ynetnews.com

Burning tires, empty pumps: $100 oil sparks global unrest as Iran war drags on

From mass protests in Syria and fishermen blocking French fuel depots to shortages across Asia, governments face a growing choice between passing soaring energy costs to consumers or taking on more debt to shield them
www.ynetnews.com www.ynetnews.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top