Agreed. Local fighters will always have a strong local following. Doesn't make them famous.I would argue that fighter that is only regionally popular isn't actually popular at all.
Agreed. Local fighters will always have a strong local following. Doesn't make them famous.I would argue that fighter that is only regionally popular isn't actually popular at all.
My point was more how do I know? You could say Connor is popular but I would say he isn't any more, certainly not over hereI don't think that is the correct judging outlook. I think you need to consider their worldwide popularity. Just because a fighter is wildly popular in Croatia, doesn't mean anyone else in the world knows about them. In that situation, that shouldn't affect the score, from my understanding of the criteria.
@thedarkwingduck2k11 , what say you?
I think it should be abundantly clear for anyone who follows MMA who is popular and who isn't. Failing that, simply searching their name in popular MMA media should be a good indicator.My point was more how do I know? You could say Connor is popular but I would say he isn't any more, certainly not over here
Conor is extremely famous, that is a terrible example.My point was more how do I know? You could say Connor is popular but I would say he isn't any more, certainly not over here
I gave you several impartial metrics.My point was more how do I know? You could say Connor is popular but I would say he isn't any more, certainly not over here
Fair, I did think that as I was writing itConor is extremely famous, that is a terrible example.
I think you just had the wrong word in your head when considering the criteria. Popular wasn't the correct angle.Fair, I did think that as I was writing it
Yes, please, let the judges make up their own criteria. Why bother following the written rules? Buckey will be thrilled.You judge how you want to judge Webble
If they didn't make up their own criteria, we wouldn't have 4 judges.Yes, please, let the judges make up their own criteria. Why bother following the written rules? Buckey will be thrilled.
are we taking points away if we know the fighters?

If they didn't make up their own criteria, we wouldn't have 4 judges.
stop stalling by asking ridiculous questions and creating confusionI don't think that is the correct judging outlook. I think you need to consider their worldwide popularity. Just because a fighter is wildly popular in Croatia, doesn't mean anyone else in the world knows about them. In that situation, that shouldn't affect the score, from my understanding of the criteria.
@thedarkwingduck2k11 , what say you?
this is collusion!I think you just had the wrong word in your head when considering the criteria. Popular wasn't the correct angle.
I'm glad they are. This gives a heads up about how they intend to go off the reservation with the criteria.Judges need to stop asking contestants pointers on how to judge. WTF.
Aren't you done losing yet?stop stalling by asking ridiculous questions and creating confusion
Sounds like Somebody's got a Roberto Soldic' clipJust because a fighter is wildly popular in Croatia, doesn't mean anyone else
SureSounds like Somebody's got a Roberto Soldic' clip![]()